Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Co-authors
- Adriana GalvánLinda Van LeijenhorstKelly E. CourtneyJ. David JentschJames MacKillopLara A. RayRussell A. PoldrackCraig R. Fox
- Topics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPersonality and Individual DifferencesHuman Brain Mapping
- Partner nations
- United StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson
11 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cognitive Neuroscience 133
- Clinical Psychology 96
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
- Applied Psychology 88
- General Decision Sciences 64
Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson. The network helps show where Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson. Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 79 | |
| 11 | 79 | |
| 12 | 77 |
About Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson
Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (64 citations), Applied Psychology (88 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations). Emily E. Barkley‐Levenson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Adriana Galván, Linda Van Leijenhorst, Kelly E. Courtney, J. David Jentsch, James MacKillop, Lara A. Ray, Russell A. Poldrack, Craig R. Fox, Stephen J. Read and Vita Droutman. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Personality and Individual Differences and Human Brain Mapping.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.