Benjamin J. Smith

647 citations
20 papers · 437 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin J. Smith

20 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Benjamin J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 230
  • General Decision Sciences 15
  • Endocrinology 39
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 107
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
Replace Cassandra White with:
Cassandra White United States
Sangil Lee South Korea
Christopher Clarke United Kingdom
Carsten Stahlhut Denmark
Hsin-Hung Li United States
Jacob Jolij Netherlands
Filipp Schmidt Germany
Richard H. A. H. Jacobs Netherlands
Manuel Suero Spain
Richard Plant United Kingdom
Benjamin J. Smith relative to Cassandra White United States Cassandra White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Cassandra White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin J. Smith. The network helps show where Benjamin J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2000153
2 200649
3 200443
4 201626
5 201825
6 202219
7 202416
8 201816
9 201815
10 197814
11 201212
12 201812
13 201712
14 20218
15 20175
16 20075
17 20142
18 20122
19 20222
20 20211

About Benjamin J. Smith

Benjamin J. Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Molecular Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (230 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations), Endocrinology (39 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (107 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations). Benjamin J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Read, Donald A. Ross, Erasmo A. Passaro, L.A. Schuh, Kost Elisevich, Mitchell M. Rohde, S.L. BeMent, S.P. Levine, Jane E. Huggins and Ramesh Kumar Kushwaha. Their work appears in journals such as Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Neurology and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact