Émilie Thienot
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Marjorie BernierJean FournierBob GroveBen JacksonJames A. DimmockCécile FlahaultAlexis Ruffault
- Topics
- Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers)Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers)Sport Psychology and Performance (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologySocial PsychologyPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Émilie Thienot
8 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Social Psychology 236
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 206
- Clinical Psychology 198
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 61
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 46
Countries citing papers authored by Émilie Thienot
This map shows the geographic impact of Émilie Thienot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Émilie Thienot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Émilie Thienot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Émilie Thienot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Émilie Thienot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Émilie Thienot. The network helps show where Émilie Thienot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Émilie Thienot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Émilie Thienot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Émilie Thienot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Émilie Thienot. Émilie Thienot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | Mindfulness in elite athletes: conceptualisation, measurement, and application | 1 |
| 5 | 108 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | 153 | |
| 8 | 4 |
About Émilie Thienot
Émilie Thienot is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers) and Sport Psychology and Performance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (206 citations), Social Psychology (236 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (46 citations). Émilie Thienot has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marjorie Bernier, Jean Fournier, Bob Grove, Ben Jackson, James A. Dimmock, Cécile Flahault and Alexis Ruffault. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of sport and exercise, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology and The Sport Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.