Émilie Proulx

503 citations
22 papers · 389 indexed · h-index 10

Émilie Proulx

21 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers

Émilie Proulx
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Aquatic Science 149
  • Physiology 43
  • Biochemistry 31
  • Environmental Chemistry 42
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 41
Replace Bruno Reis with:
Bruno Reis Portugal
Arun Bhai Patel India
Jiajia Wang China
Juan Gabriel Correa-Reyes Mexico
Jo-Anne L. Tabachek Canada
Kenneth J. Semmens United States
Mario Nieves-Soto Mexico
Alex R. Angell Australia
Edilmar Cortés‐Jacinto Mexico
Mahmut Yanar Türkiye
Émilie Proulx relative to Bruno Reis Portugal Bruno Reis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Bruno Reis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Émilie Proulx

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Émilie Proulx's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Émilie Proulx with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Émilie Proulx more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Émilie Proulx

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Émilie Proulx. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Émilie Proulx. The network helps show where Émilie Proulx may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Émilie Proulx, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Émilie Proulx Line = papers co-authored together Émilie Proulx links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20251
3 20251
4 20234
5 202040
6
Contribution to the Identification of a Local and Available Food Source for Sustainable Production of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linnaeus, 1758) in the Democratic Republic of Congo
20182
7 20183
8 20184
9 20148
10 20143
11 201413
12 201321
13 20135
14 201256
15 201148
16 201021
17 201028
18 200773
19
Quality attributes limiting papaya postharvest life at chilling and non-chilling temperatures
200526
20 20034

About Émilie Proulx

Émilie Proulx is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Physiology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Toxicology and Immunology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (8 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (5 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (4 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (4 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (3 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (149 citations), Physiology (43 citations), Biochemistry (31 citations), Environmental Chemistry (42 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (41 citations). Émilie Proulx has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Grant W. Vandenberg, Pallab K. Sarker, Jeffrey K. Brecht, J. P. Emond, Maria Cecilia do Nascimento Nunes, Marc Auffret, Sharon Dea, Daniel Proulx, Richard Villemur and Anne R. Kapuscinski. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, Conservation Physiology, Social Science Computer Review and HortScience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026