Conservation Physiology

989 papers and 17.1k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 989 papers published in Conservation Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 17.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Conservation Physiology usually cover Ecology (631 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (351 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (283 papers) specifically the topics of Physiological and biochemical adaptations (313 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (247 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Conservation Physiology are Steven J. Cooke, Jennifer L. Funk, Sjannie Lefevre, Craig E. Franklin, Jodie L. Rummer, Amanda L. Kelley, Anthony P. Farrell, Edward Narayan, Piotr Minias and Fiona R. Hay.

In The Last Decade

Conservation Physiology

907 papers receiving 16.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Conservation Physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Conservation Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Conservation Physiology.

Countries where authors publish in Conservation Physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Conservation Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Conservation Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation Physiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026