Countries where authors publish in Conservation Physiology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Conservation Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Conservation Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation Physiology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Conservation Physiology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Conservation Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Conservation Physiology.
About Conservation Physiology
The 1.0k papers published in Conservation Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 17.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Conservation Physiology usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (358 papers), Ecology (639 papers), Small Animals (125 papers), Ecological Modeling (72 papers) and Aquatic Science (108 papers) specifically the topics of Physiological and biochemical adaptations (317 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (250 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (144 papers), Marine animal studies overview (135 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (118 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (116 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (103 papers) and Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Conservation Physiology are Steven J. Cooke, Jennifer L. Funk, Sjannie Lefevre, Craig E. Franklin, Jodie L. Rummer, Anthony P. Farrell, Amanda L. Kelley, Piotr Minias, Fiona R. Hay and Edward Narayan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.