Emerson M. Pugh

1.9k citations
26 papers · 753 indexed · h-index 14

Emerson M. Pugh

25 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers

Emerson M. Pugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • General Materials Science 43
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 247
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 320
  • Condensed Matter Physics 94
  • Materials Chemistry 265
Replace J. K. Galt with:
J. K. Galt
R A Brown Australia
V. Arp United States
S.P. Marsh United Kingdom
D. Gugan United Kingdom
R.G. Scurlock United Kingdom
L. V. Meisel United States
Moisei I Kaganov Russia
F. I. Fedorov Belarus
G. E. Duvall United States
Emerson M. Pugh relative to J. K. Galt J. K. Galt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
J. K. Galt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emerson M. Pugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emerson M. Pugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emerson M. Pugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emerson M. Pugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emerson M. Pugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emerson M. Pugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emerson M. Pugh. The network helps show where Emerson M. Pugh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Emerson M. Pugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emerson M. Pugh Line = papers co-authored together Emerson M. Pugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19713
2 196723
3 196616
4
The analysis of physical measurements
196683
5 19646
6 196412
7 196212
8 196113
9 196117
10 19611
11 196014
12 195812
13 195824
14 195711
15 195533
16 19531
17 1953129
18 19529
19 195243
20 19519

About Emerson M. Pugh

Emerson M. Pugh is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, General Materials Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties and Applications (13 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (9 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (5 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (3 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (3 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Materials Science (43 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (247 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (320 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (94 citations) and Materials Chemistry (265 citations). Emerson M. Pugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include N. Rostoker, R. J. Eichelberger, G.H. Winslow, S. Foner, A. I. Schindler, A. C. Ehrlich, C. H. K. Williamson, George M. Bryan, Emerson W. Pugh and Stephen B. Soffer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Reviews of Modern Physics, American Journal of Physics, Meteoritics and Physical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026