Countries citing papers authored by Emanuela Todeva
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuela Todeva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuela Todeva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuela Todeva more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuela Todeva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuela Todeva. The network helps show where Emanuela Todeva may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emanuela Todeva
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emanuela Todeva.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emanuela Todeva based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Emanuela Todeva. Emanuela Todeva is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Todeva, Emanuela. (2020). The Global Innovation Index as a Measure of Triple Helix Engagement. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
2.
Todeva, Emanuela. (2019). The Challenges of Mobilising Triple Helix Stakeholders. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
3.
Humphrey, John, et al.. (2019). Cadeias globais de valor, redes de negócios, estratégia e negócios internacionais: convergências. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 21(4). 607–627.1 indexed citations
4.
Todeva, Emanuela & Mike Danson. (2016). Regional Dimensions of the Triple Helix Model. MPRA Paper.2 indexed citations
5.
Todeva, Emanuela. (2014). Market Driven Clusters as Prerequisites and Consequences of Smart Specialisation. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
6.
Todeva, Emanuela. (2014). Business Network Theory and the Role of Country of Origin. XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 13-19, 2014).2 indexed citations
7.
Todeva, Emanuela, et al.. (2013). The Triple Helix as a Highly Charged Intellectual Enterprise. MPRA Paper.1 indexed citations
8.
Todeva, Emanuela, et al.. (2010). Business History in the UK Research Assessment Exercise. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Todeva, Emanuela. (2007). Behavioural Theory of the Firm. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.34 indexed citations
11.
Todeva, Emanuela. (2006). Governance, Control & Co-Ordination in Network Context: The Cases of Japanese Keiretsu and Sogo Shosha. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
12.
Todeva, Emanuela. (2005). Foreign Market Entry and Internationalisation of Business Network. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
13.
Todeva, Emanuela & Haico Ebbers. (2003). Integration of Central and Eastern Europe into the 21st century world-economy. Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey).1 indexed citations
14.
Todeva, Emanuela & David Knoke. (2002). Strategic Alliances and Corporate Social Capital. SSRN Electronic Journal. 54(2). 345–380.4 indexed citations
15.
Todeva, Emanuela. (2001). Shaping the Competition and Building Competitive Advantage in the Global Telecommunication Industry: The Case of British Telecommunications Plc. Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.