Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within
it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
2013Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews
2008Social Network Analysis
1996Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews
1990Social Forces
1980Medical Entomology and Zoology
Peers
David Knoke
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
Public Administration1.2k
Communication1.1k
Strategy and Management1.8k
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management1.2k
This map shows the geographic impact of David Knoke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Knoke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Knoke more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Knoke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Knoke. The network helps show where David Knoke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Knoke, linked wherever they have
co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they
share.
Border = papers with David KnokeLine = papers co-authored togetherDavid Knoke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
Entscheidungsprozesse in der Arbeits- und Sozialpolitik : Der Zugang der Interessengruppen zum Regierungssystem über Politikfeldnetze; Ein deutsch-amerikanischer Vergleich
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.