Emanuel Lewis

465 total citations
14 papers, 293 citations indexed

About

Emanuel Lewis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emanuel Lewis has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 293 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 1 paper in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Emanuel Lewis's work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper). Emanuel Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper). Emanuel Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Emanuel Lewis's co-authors include Patrick Casement, Eugene F. Roth, Claire Snowdon, Helen Statham, Josephine Green, Judith Trowell, AlbertB. Lowenfels and Michael Baum and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Child Abuse & Neglect and Journal of Family Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Emanuel Lewis

14 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emanuel Lewis United Kingdom 7 250 106 88 33 33 14 293
Beth A. Rabinovich United States 8 259 1.0× 171 1.6× 88 1.0× 25 0.8× 61 1.8× 18 343
E. Lewis United Kingdom 5 153 0.6× 72 0.7× 56 0.6× 18 0.5× 18 0.5× 6 185
Marian C. J. Cuisinier Netherlands 9 284 1.1× 200 1.9× 110 1.3× 23 0.7× 82 2.5× 10 369
Monique Bydlowski France 9 179 0.7× 136 1.3× 79 0.9× 39 1.2× 53 1.6× 32 340
Joann O’Leary United States 12 372 1.5× 187 1.8× 126 1.4× 42 1.3× 88 2.7× 19 413
William Badenhorst United Kingdom 4 274 1.1× 159 1.5× 71 0.8× 21 0.6× 73 2.2× 6 323
Michelle Oberman United States 10 79 0.3× 87 0.8× 103 1.2× 54 1.6× 13 0.4× 37 276
Ruth Dölemeyer Germany 6 262 1.0× 100 0.9× 92 1.0× 42 1.3× 9 0.3× 8 310
Gerald Schneiderman Canada 6 321 1.3× 200 1.9× 137 1.6× 30 0.9× 5 0.2× 19 380
Catherine Collins United Kingdom 5 178 0.7× 131 1.2× 56 0.6× 33 1.0× 105 3.2× 10 284

Countries citing papers authored by Emanuel Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuel Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuel Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuel Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuel Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuel Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuel Lewis. The network helps show where Emanuel Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emanuel Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emanuel Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emanuel Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emanuel Lewis. Emanuel Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Statham, Helen, et al.. (1991). When is a fetus a dead baby?. The Lancet. 337(8745). 856–856. 6 indexed citations
2.
Lewis, Emanuel, et al.. (1989). 14 Perinatal death. Baillière s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 3(4). 935–953. 14 indexed citations
3.
Lewis, Emanuel & Judith Trowell. (1988). SECRET OBSERVATION OF CHILDREN IN HOSPITAL. The Lancet. 331(8592). 998–998. 1 indexed citations
4.
Baum, Michael, et al.. (1988). DEATH TAKES A HOLIDAY. The Lancet. 332(8618). 1030–1031. 6 indexed citations
5.
Lewis, Emanuel & Patrick Casement. (1986). The inhibition of mourning by pregnancy a case study. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy. 2(1). 45–52. 4 indexed citations
6.
Lewis, Emanuel, et al.. (1984). PREGNANCY AFTER STILLBIRTH OR NEONATAL DEATH. The Lancet. 324(8393). 31–33. 47 indexed citations
7.
Lewis, Emanuel. (1979). Counter‐transference problems in hospital practice. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 52(1). 37–42. 12 indexed citations
8.
Lewis, Emanuel. (1979). Two hidden predisposing factors in child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect. 3(1). 327–330. 14 indexed citations
9.
Lewis, Emanuel, et al.. (1979). The impact of a stillbirth on a marriage. Journal of Family Therapy. 1(3). 361–369. 6 indexed citations
10.
Lewis, Emanuel, et al.. (1978). Failure to mourn a stillbirth: An overlooked catastrophe. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 51(3). 237–241. 80 indexed citations
11.
Lewis, Emanuel. (1976). The atmosphere in the labour ward. Journal of Child Psychotherapy. 4(2). 89–92. 6 indexed citations
12.
Lewis, Emanuel. (1976). THE MANAGEMENT OF STILLBIRTH COPING WITH AN UNREALITY. The Lancet. 308(7986). 619–620. 88 indexed citations
13.
Lewis, Emanuel. (1976). Encopresis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 69(1). 20–21. 3 indexed citations
14.
Lewis, Emanuel, et al.. (1963). NORTH WING. The Lancet. 281(7273). 156–159. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026