Ruth Dölemeyer

456 total citations
8 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Ruth Dölemeyer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Dölemeyer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ruth Dölemeyer's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers). Ruth Dölemeyer is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers). Ruth Dölemeyer collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United States. Ruth Dölemeyer's co-authors include Birgit Wagner, Anette Kersting, Jana Steinig, Katja Baust, Kristin Kroker, Grit Klinitzke, Michaela Nagl, Anja Hilbert, E. Shang and Katja Linde and has published in prestigious journals such as Obesity Reviews, Behavior Therapy and BMC Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Dölemeyer

8 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Dölemeyer Germany 6 262 100 92 68 42 8 310
Renée Grenon Canada 12 310 1.2× 46 0.5× 57 0.6× 26 0.4× 31 0.7× 21 452
Hannah Welch United States 8 210 0.8× 46 0.5× 85 0.9× 27 0.4× 74 1.8× 17 282
Amy E. Hale United States 10 132 0.5× 47 0.5× 63 0.7× 27 0.4× 22 0.5× 19 288
Emilie Lacroix Canada 10 213 0.8× 111 1.1× 36 0.4× 33 0.5× 20 0.5× 23 328
Jason Van Allen United States 9 66 0.3× 66 0.7× 33 0.4× 53 0.8× 46 1.1× 34 243
Anna Booth Australia 8 168 0.6× 123 1.2× 40 0.4× 18 0.3× 34 0.8× 27 268
Cheryl Webb Canada 9 145 0.6× 49 0.5× 43 0.5× 19 0.3× 47 1.1× 28 235
James P Roehrig United States 8 284 1.1× 97 1.0× 53 0.6× 41 0.6× 31 0.7× 10 345
Natália Kaščáková Czechia 9 167 0.6× 48 0.5× 28 0.3× 45 0.7× 50 1.2× 24 255
Lindsay Borden United States 9 154 0.6× 38 0.4× 26 0.3× 45 0.7× 61 1.5× 18 289

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Dölemeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Dölemeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Dölemeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Dölemeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Dölemeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Dölemeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Dölemeyer. The network helps show where Ruth Dölemeyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Dölemeyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Dölemeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Dölemeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Dölemeyer. Ruth Dölemeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Kersting, Anette, Ruth Dölemeyer, Birgit Wagner, & Katja Linde. (2017). Abschied am Beginn des Lebens. Psychotherapeut. 62(6). 560–566. 3 indexed citations
2.
Wagner, Birgit, Michaela Nagl, Ruth Dölemeyer, et al.. (2016). Randomized Controlled Trial of an Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Program for Binge-Eating Disorder. Behavior Therapy. 47(4). 500–514. 46 indexed citations
3.
Röhr, Susanne, et al.. (2014). Kindesmisshandlung bei Binge-Eating-Störung: Ein systematischer Literaturüberblick. Psychiatrische Praxis. 42(3). 125–132. 6 indexed citations
4.
Kersting, Anette, Ruth Dölemeyer, Jana Steinig, et al.. (2013). Brief Internet-Based Intervention Reduces Posttraumatic Stress and Prolonged Grief in Parents after the Loss of a Child during Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 82(6). 372–381. 141 indexed citations
5.
Dölemeyer, Ruth, et al.. (2013). Internet-based interventions for eating disorders in adults: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 13(1). 207–207. 75 indexed citations
6.
Klinitzke, Grit, Ruth Dölemeyer, Jana Steinig, Birgit Wagner, & Anette Kersting. (2013). Internetbasierte Therapie nach Verlust eines Kindes in der Schwangerschaft - Einfluss sozialer Unterstützung auf die Verarbeitung des Verlusts. Verhaltenstherapie. 23(3). 181–188. 4 indexed citations
7.
Dölemeyer, Ruth, Grit Klinitzke, Jana Steinig, Birgit Wagner, & Anette Kersting. (2013). Die therapeutische Beziehung in einem internetbasierten Programm zur Behandlung der Binge-Eating-Störung. Psychiatrische Praxis. 40(6). 321–326. 13 indexed citations
8.
Steinig, Jana, Birgit Wagner, E. Shang, Ruth Dölemeyer, & Anette Kersting. (2012). Sexual abuse in bariatric surgery candidates – impact on weight loss after surgery: a systematic review. Obesity Reviews. 13(10). 892–901. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026