Helen Statham

2.6k total citations
48 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Helen Statham is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen Statham has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 15 papers in Molecular Biology and 10 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Helen Statham's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (11 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (9 papers) and Muscle Physiology and Disorders (8 papers). Helen Statham is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (11 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (9 papers) and Muscle Physiology and Disorders (8 papers). Helen Statham collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and United States. Helen Statham's co-authors include Jonathan Green, F Murton, Martin Richards, Nina Hallowell, Jane Weaver, C.J. Duncan, Konstantinos Kafetsios, Jenny Gamble, Christine McCourt and Debra Creedy and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, The Journal of Physiology and Biochemical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Helen Statham

47 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Helen Statham

PPCH

PHEOH

GENET

Dorothy C. Wertz United States

Robert G. Resta United States

Marcia E. Herman‐Giddens United States

Patricia A. King United States

Lijing Ouyang United States

Josephine Green United Kingdom

Jennifer L. Marino Australia

Beverly Petterson Australia

Susan Cox Canada

Roberta Venturella Italy

Dorothy C. Wertz United States

Helen Statham

861 ×1.0

PPCH

210 ×0.4

454 ×0.8

PHEOH

629 ×1.5

GENET

287 ×0.8

Citations per year, relative to Helen Statham Helen Statham (= 1×) peers Dorothy C. Wertz

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Statham

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Statham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Statham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Statham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Statham

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Statham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Statham. The network helps show where Helen Statham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Statham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Statham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Statham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Statham. Helen Statham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hughes, Anna E., Helen Statham, & Alasdair D. F. Clarke. (2024). The effect of target scarcity on visual foraging. Royal Society Open Science. 11(12). 240060–240060.

Breeze, Andrew, Helen Statham, Gerald Hackett, F. A. Jessop, & C. Lees. (2012). Perinatal Postmortems: What Is Important to Parents and How Do They Decide?. Birth. 39(1). 57–64. 45 indexed citations

Breeze, Andrew, Helen Statham, Gerald Hackett, F. A. Jessop, & C. Lees. (2011). Attitudes to perinatal postmortem: parental views about research participation: Table 1. Journal of Medical Ethics. 37(6). 364–367. 14 indexed citations

Statham, Helen, et al.. (2010). A family perspective of the value of a diagnosis for intellectual disability: experiences from a genetic research study. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 39(1). 46–56. 10 indexed citations

Weaver, Jane, Helen Statham, & Martin Richards. (2007). Are There “Unnecessary” Cesarean Sections? Perceptions of Women and Obstetricians About Cesarean Sections for Nonclinical Indications. Birth. 34(1). 32–41. 143 indexed citations

McCourt, Christine, Jane Weaver, Helen Statham, et al.. (2007). Elective Cesarean Section and Decision Making: A Critical Review of the Literature. Birth. 34(1). 65–79. 259 indexed citations

Statham, Helen, et al.. (2006). Late termination of pregnancy: law, policy and decision making in four English fetal medicine units. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 113(12). 1402–1411. 38 indexed citations

Statham, Helen, et al.. (2003). Communication of prenatal screening and diagnosis results to primary-care health professionals. Public Health. 117(5). 348–357. 7 indexed citations

Green, Jonathan, et al.. (2003). Factor Structure, Validity and Reliability of the Cambridge Worry Scale in a Pregnant Population. Journal of Health Psychology. 8(6). 753–764. 186 indexed citations

10.

Statham, Helen, et al.. (2000). Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: psychological effects on women in low-risk pregnancies. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 14(4). 731–747. 93 indexed citations

11.

Hallowell, Nina, Helen Statham, & F Murton. (1998). Women's Understanding of Their Risk of Developing Breast/Ovarian Cancer Before and After Genetic Counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 7(4). 345–364. 39 indexed citations

12.

Murton, F, et al.. (1998). Genetic Counseling, Reproductive Behavior and Future Reproductive Intentions of People with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1). Journal of Genetic Counseling. 7(4). 331–344. 9 indexed citations

13.

Statham, Helen, et al.. (1997). Genetic counselling for breast and ovarian cancer: Why do women attend?. 8. 179–180. 3 indexed citations

14.

Murton, F, et al.. (1997). Family communication following genetic counselling for breast/ovarian cancer. 8. 178–179. 2 indexed citations

15.

Statham, Helen, Jonathan Green, & Konstantinos Kafetsios. (1997). Who Worries That Something Might Be Wrong With the Baby? A Prospective Study of 1072 Pregnant Women. Birth. 24(4). 223–233. 87 indexed citations

16.

Hallowell, Nina, et al.. (1997). Women's need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: a questionnaire, interview, and observational study. BMJ. 314(7076). 281–281. 87 indexed citations

17.

Green, Jonathan, Helen Statham, & Claire Snowdon. (1993). Women's knowledge of prenatal screening tests. 1: Relationships with hospital screening policy and demographic factors. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 11(1). 11–20. 31 indexed citations

18.

Statham, Helen, et al.. (1993). Serum screening for Down's syndrome: some women's experiences.. BMJ. 307(6897). 174–176. 76 indexed citations

19.

Dünn, Michael J., Helen Statham, Arthur H.M. Burghes, Catherine Rice‐Evans, & Victor Dubowitz. (1980). Erythrocyte membrane studies in duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell Biology International Reports. 4(8). 782–782. 4 indexed citations

20.

Statham, Helen & C.J. Duncan. (1976). Dantrolene and neutromuscular junction: Evidence for intracellular calcium stores. European Journal of Pharmacology. 39(1). 143–152. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact