Elmer Rees

45 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Elmer Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Geometry and Topology 295
  • Algebra and Number Theory 97
  • Mathematical Physics 190
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 49
  • Applied Mathematics 73
Replace Andrew H. Wallace with:
Andrew H. Wallace United Kingdom
J. F. P. Hudson United States
E. E. Floyd United States
C. T. Yang United States
Jürgen Elstrodt Germany
Emery Thomas United States
Lee Paul Neuwirth United States
Daniel R. Grayson United States
James B. Carrell Canada
Elmer Rees relative to Andrew H. Wallace United Kingdom Andrew H. Wallace's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Andrew H. Wallace · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elmer Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elmer Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elmer Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elmer Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elmer Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elmer Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elmer Rees. The network helps show where Elmer Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Elmer Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elmer Rees Line = papers co-authored together Elmer Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199736
2 197635
3 199834
4
Notes on Geometry
198232
5 198225
6 198718
7 198315
8 197115
9 199615
10 199614
11 199114
12 199212
13 199111
14 199311
15 200211
16 200411
17 200410
18 200810
19 19749
20 19719

About Elmer Rees

Elmer Rees is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Applied Mathematics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topics in Algebra (11 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (9 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (9 papers), Mathematics and Applications (8 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (8 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (6 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (6 papers) and Geometry and complex manifolds (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (295 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (97 citations), Mathematical Physics (190 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (49 citations) and Applied Mathematics (73 citations). Elmer Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Victor Matveevich Buchstaber, Michael Atiyah, Виктор Матвеевич Бухштабер, F. E. A. Johnson, Benjamin M. Mann, Krzysztof Galicki, Charles P. Boyer, Timothy Killingback, Emery Thomas and R. James Milgram. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Russian Mathematical Surveys, Journal of the London Mathematical Society and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact