Countries citing papers authored by Elliot J. Berg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elliot J. Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliot J. Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliot J. Berg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliot J. Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliot J. Berg. The network helps show where Elliot J. Berg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elliot J. Berg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elliot J. Berg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elliot J. Berg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elliot J. Berg. Elliot J. Berg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Berg, Elliot J.. (1993). Rethinking technical cooperation: reforms for capacity building in Africa.. Medical Entomology and Zoology.113 indexed citations
7.
Feinberg, Richard, et al.. (1991). From confrontation to cooperation? : U.S. and Soviet aid to developing countries.1 indexed citations
Berg, Elliot J.. (1968). Industrial Relations Systems in Colonial West Africa: A Comparative Analysis of French West Africa and the Gold Coast. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.