Citations per year, relative to Björn Beckman Björn Beckman (= 1×)
peers
Adebayo Olukoshi
Countries citing papers authored by Björn Beckman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Björn Beckman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Björn Beckman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Björn Beckman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Björn Beckman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Björn Beckman. The network helps show where Björn Beckman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Björn Beckman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Björn Beckman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Björn Beckman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Björn Beckman. Björn Beckman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Beckman, Björn, et al.. (2011). Trade unions, tailors, and civil society. 44(1). 18–42.7 indexed citations
3.
Beckman, Björn, et al.. (2010). The failure of Nigeria's Labour Party. 59–84.4 indexed citations
4.
Beckman, Björn, Sakhela Buhlungu, & Lloyd Sachikonye. (2010). Trade unions & party politics: labour movements in Africa. 219.21 indexed citations
5.
Beckman, Björn, et al.. (2007). Globalization, imperialism and resistance.1 indexed citations
6.
Beckman, Björn. (2002). Trade Unions and Institutional Reform: Nigerian Experiences With South African and Ugandan Comparisons. Transformation. 10(48). 83–115.8 indexed citations
7.
Beckman, Björn & Lloyd Sachikonye. (2001). Labour regimes and liberalization : the restructuring of state-society relations in Africa.12 indexed citations
8.
Sjögren, Anders, et al.. (2001). Civil society and authoritarianism in the third world : a conference book.4 indexed citations
9.
Beckman, Björn, et al.. (1998). Union Power in the Nigerian Textile Industry: Labour Regime and Adjustment. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).11 indexed citations
10.
Beckman, Björn. (1998). The liberation of civil society : neo-liberal ideology and political theory in an african context. 45–62.5 indexed citations
11.
Beckman, Björn. (1997). Explaining Democratization : Notes of the Concept of the Civil Society.1 indexed citations
12.
Beckman, Björn, et al.. (1997). Vietnam : Reform and Transformation.6 indexed citations
13.
Beckman, Björn, et al.. (1996). BARGAINING FOR SURVIVAL UNIONIZED WORKERS IN THE NIGERIAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY.
14.
Beckman, Björn, et al.. (1996). UNIONIZED WORKERS IN THE NIGERIAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY.
15.
Beckman, Björn. (1995). The politics of labour and adjustment : the experience of the Nigeria labour congress. 281–323.3 indexed citations
Beckman, Björn. (1991). Empowerment or Repression: The World Bank and the Politics of African Adjustment. Africa Development: a Quarterly Journal of CODESRIA. 16(1). 45–72.36 indexed citations
18.
Beckman, Björn, et al.. (1989). Förhandlingsekonomin i regionalpolitiken.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.