Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth
2014535 citationsJonathan D. Ostry, Andrew Berg et al.profile →
Redistribution, inequality, and growth: new evidence
2018225 citationsAndrew Berg, Jonathan D. Ostry et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Berg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Berg. The network helps show where Andrew Berg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Berg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Berg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Berg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Berg. Andrew Berg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Loungani, Prakash & Andrew Berg. (2018). Confronting Inequality. Columbia University Press eBooks.20 indexed citations
4.
Berg, Andrew, et al.. (2016). Robots, crecimiento y desigualdad: la revolución robótica podría tener un profundo impacto negativo sobre la equidad. 53(3). 10–13.2 indexed citations
5.
Ostry, Jonathan D., Andrew Berg, & Charalambos Tsangarides. (2014). Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.65 indexed citations
6.
Ostry, Jonathan D., Andrew Berg, & Charalambos Tsangarides. (2014). Redistribución, Desigualdad Y Crecimiento (Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth). SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
7.
Ostry, Jonathan D., Andrew Berg, & Charalambos Tsangarides. (2013). REDISTRIBUCIÓN, DESIGUALDAD Y CRECIMIENTO. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Berg, Andrew, et al.. (2013). Неравенство и неустойчивый рост: две стороны одной медали. International Organisations Research Journal. 8(4). 77–99.4 indexed citations
10.
Berg, Andrew, et al.. (2013). Forecasting and Monetary Policy Analysis in Low-Income Countries: Food and non-Food Inflation in Kenya. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
Stone, Mark, et al.. (2003). Re-Establishing Credible Nominal Anchors After a Financial Crisis; A Review of Recent Experience. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
Berg, Andrew, Eduardo Borensztein, Ratna Sahay, & Jeromin Zettelmeyer. (1999). The Evolution of Output in Transition Economies: Explaining the Differences. SSRN Electronic Journal.32 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.