Philipp Sterzer

14.7k citations
197 papers · 9.8k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 54

Philipp Sterzer

191 papers receiving 9.7k citations

Hit Papers

The Predictive Coding Account...4842003202620102018250500750

Peers

Philipp Sterzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 7.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.1k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 195
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
Replace Nicolas Delcroix with:
Nicolas Delcroix France
Satrajit Ghosh United States
Adam Gazzaley United States
Nico U.F. Dosenbach United States
Alexander L. Cohen United States
Brigitte Rockstroh Germany
N. Tzourio-Mazoyer France
Markus Ullsperger Germany
Pietro Pietrini Italy
Antoni Rodrı́guez-Fornells Spain
Philipp Sterzer relative to Nicolas Delcroix France Nicolas Delcroix's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Nicolas Delcroix · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Sterzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Sterzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Sterzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Sterzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Sterzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Sterzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Sterzer. The network helps show where Philipp Sterzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Sterzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Sterzer Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Sterzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20253
2 20250
3 20241
4 202413
5 201947
6 201826
7 201811
8 201813
9 201633
10 20155
11 20141
12 2014116
13 2013143
14 201229
15 20121
16 20121
17 2012182
18 20111
19 200961
20 2006153

About Philipp Sterzer

Philipp Sterzer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 197 papers that have together received 9.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (80 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (68 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (56 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (42 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (32 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (23 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (20 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (7.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.1k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (1.5k citations). Philipp Sterzer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Kleinschmidt, Timo Stein, Andreas Heinz, Geraint Rees, Evelyn Eger, Katharina Schmack, Florian Schlagenhauf, Marcus Rothkirch, Anne‐Lise Giraud and Christina Stadler. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Journal of Vision, Frontiers in Psychology, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026