Ellen Wingbermühle
- Molecular Biology
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- J.I.M. EggerRoy P. C. KesselsW.M.A. VerhoevenWilliam M. van der VeldI. van der BürgtIneke van der BurgtS. TuinierTjitske Kleefstra
- Topics
- Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases (10 papers)Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (10 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ellen Wingbermühle
22 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Molecular Biology 138
- Psychiatry and Mental health 105
- Genetics 97
- Cognitive Neuroscience 78
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 65
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Wingbermühle
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Wingbermühle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Wingbermühle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Wingbermühle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Wingbermühle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Wingbermühle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Wingbermühle. The network helps show where Ellen Wingbermühle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen Wingbermühle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen Wingbermühle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen Wingbermühle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen Wingbermühle. Ellen Wingbermühle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | Exploring the incorporation of executive functions in intelligence testing: Factor analysis of the WAIS-III and traditional tasks of executive functioning. | 8 |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 61 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 37 |
About Ellen Wingbermühle
Ellen Wingbermühle is a scholar working on Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases (10 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (10 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (105 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (65 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (78 citations). Ellen Wingbermühle has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J.I.M. Egger, Roy P. C. Kessels, W.M.A. Verhoeven, William M. van der Veld, I. van der Bürgt, Ineke van der Burgt, S. Tuinier, Tjitske Kleefstra, Pierre M. Souren and Paul T. van der Heijden. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Journal of Hypertension and Frontiers in Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.