W.M.A. Verhoeven
- Genetics top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- S. TuinierJ.I.M. EggerF.M.M.A. van der HeijdenEllen WingbermühleNicole de LeeuwTjitske KleefstraRoy P. C. KesselsDurk Fekkes
- Topics
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (32 papers)Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (21 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyJapan
In The Last Decade
W.M.A. Verhoeven
100 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Genetics 536
- Psychiatry and Mental health 497
- Molecular Biology 476
- Cognitive Neuroscience 364
- Clinical Psychology 258
Countries citing papers authored by W.M.A. Verhoeven
This map shows the geographic impact of W.M.A. Verhoeven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.M.A. Verhoeven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.M.A. Verhoeven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W.M.A. Verhoeven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.M.A. Verhoeven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.M.A. Verhoeven. The network helps show where W.M.A. Verhoeven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W.M.A. Verhoeven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W.M.A. Verhoeven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W.M.A. Verhoeven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W.M.A. Verhoeven. W.M.A. Verhoeven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 61 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | Psychopathology and social cognition in 10 patients with Noonan syndrome | 15 |
| 13 | 81 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About W.M.A. Verhoeven
W.M.A. Verhoeven is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Genetics, having authored 109 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (32 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (21 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (497 citations), Genetics (536 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (364 citations). W.M.A. Verhoeven has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include S. Tuinier, J.I.M. Egger, F.M.M.A. van der Heijden, Ellen Wingbermühle, Nicole de Leeuw, Tjitske Kleefstra, Roy P. C. Kessels, Durk Fekkes, Mechteld L.C. Hoogendoorn and René S. Kahn. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.