Ellen Widmer
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Japanese History and Culture
- Asian Culture and Media Studies
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Chinese history and philosophy
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
- Asian Studies and History
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 19
- Marriage and Sexual Relationships 1
-
- Japanese History and Culture 5
- Asian Culture and Media Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Philip F. Williams (1 shared paper)David Der-wei Wang (1 shared paper)Judith T. Zeitlin (1 shared paper)Jing Wang (1 shared paper)Dorothy Ko (1 shared paper)Robert E. Hegel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Late imperial China (3 papers)The Journal of Asian Studies (2 papers)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Ming Studies (1 paper)World Literature Today (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ellen Widmer
20 papers receiving 87 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Cultural Studies 103
- Sociology and Political Science 173
- Anthropology 34
- History and Philosophy of Science 8
- Classics 5
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Widmer
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Widmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Widmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Widmer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Widmer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Widmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Widmer. The network helps show where Ellen Widmer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Widmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 27 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 27 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 26 | |
| 4 | Writing and Materiality in China: Essays in Honor of Patrick Hanan | 2003 | 20 |
| 5 | 1996 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 16 | The Margins of Utopia: Shui-hu hou-chuan and the Literature of Ming Loyalism | 1987 | 3 |
| 17 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 1 |
About Ellen Widmer
Ellen Widmer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and History, having authored 25 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (19 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (1 paper), Philippine History and Culture (1 paper), Travel Writing and Literature (1 paper), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (1 paper) and China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (103 citations), Sociology and Political Science (173 citations), Anthropology (34 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations) and Classics (5 citations). Ellen Widmer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip F. Williams, David Der-wei Wang, Judith T. Zeitlin, Jing Wang, Dorothy Ko and Robert E. Hegel. Their work appears in journals such as Late imperial China, The Journal of Asian Studies, The American Historical Review, Ming Studies and World Literature Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.