Ellen M. Kok

1.6k total citations
41 papers, 854 citations indexed

About

Ellen M. Kok is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Family Practice and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ellen M. Kok has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 854 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 16 papers in Family Practice and 11 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ellen M. Kok's work include Radiology practices and education (18 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (16 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (9 papers). Ellen M. Kok is often cited by papers focused on Radiology practices and education (18 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (16 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (9 papers). Ellen M. Kok collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Spain. Ellen M. Kok's co-authors include Simon G. F. Robben, Halszka Jarodzka, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, J. Martijn Nobel, Jill Lobbestael, Andries de Grip, Brent Thoma, Lynsey J. Martin and Simon Huang and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Academic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Ellen M. Kok

41 papers receiving 824 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ellen M. Kok Netherlands 17 328 192 166 135 123 41 854
Marieke F. van der Schaaf Netherlands 20 257 0.8× 195 1.0× 61 0.4× 272 2.0× 136 1.1× 83 1.1k
Jeroen Donkers Netherlands 17 103 0.3× 225 1.2× 78 0.5× 438 3.2× 122 1.0× 68 873
Anna T. Cianciolo United States 17 80 0.2× 186 1.0× 168 1.0× 415 3.1× 128 1.0× 63 1.0k
Marieke van der Schaaf Netherlands 18 172 0.5× 390 2.0× 51 0.3× 819 6.1× 127 1.0× 40 1.4k
Nancy Franklin United States 16 308 0.9× 900 4.7× 509 3.1× 480 3.6× 310 2.5× 31 2.3k
Temple Ratcliffe United States 14 175 0.5× 594 3.1× 46 0.3× 579 4.3× 23 0.2× 43 943
Andrzej A. Kononowicz Poland 16 134 0.4× 320 1.7× 18 0.1× 595 4.4× 71 0.6× 74 1.4k
Douglas P. Larsen United States 13 224 0.7× 434 2.3× 84 0.5× 795 5.9× 183 1.5× 22 1.3k
Shirley Lee Canada 10 93 0.3× 75 0.4× 29 0.2× 201 1.5× 25 0.2× 27 565
Sylvain Coderre Canada 19 245 0.7× 595 3.1× 29 0.2× 834 6.2× 42 0.3× 58 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen M. Kok

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen M. Kok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen M. Kok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen M. Kok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen M. Kok

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen M. Kok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen M. Kok. The network helps show where Ellen M. Kok may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen M. Kok

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen M. Kok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen M. Kok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen M. Kok. Ellen M. Kok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kok, Ellen M., Diederick C. Niehorster, Anouk van der Gijp, et al.. (2024). The effects of gaze-display feedback on medical students’ self-monitoring and learning in radiology. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 29(5). 1689–1710. 2 indexed citations
2.
Kok, Ellen M., et al.. (2024). Teaching through their eyes: effects on optometry teachers’ adaptivity and students’ learning when teachers see students’ gaze. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 29(5). 1735–1748. 1 indexed citations
3.
Koning, Björn B. de, Wichor M. Bramer, Maryam Asoodar, et al.. (2024). A Cognitive Load Theory Approach to Understanding Expert Scaffolding of Visual Problem-Solving Tasks: A Scoping Review. Educational Psychology Review. 36(1). 18 indexed citations
5.
Kok, Ellen M., Halszka Jarodzka, Matthew Sibbald, & Tamara van Gog. (2023). Did You Get That? Predicting Learners’ Comprehension of a Video Lecture from Visualizations of Their Gaze Data. Cognitive Science. 47(2). e13247–e13247. 6 indexed citations
6.
Kok, Ellen M., et al.. (2020). Effects of prior knowledge and joint attention on learning from eye movement modelling examples. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 36(4). 569–579. 12 indexed citations
7.
Kok, Ellen M., Koen L. Vincken, Marieke van der Schaaf, et al.. (2020). Expertise development in volumetric image interpretation of radiology residents: what do longitudinal scroll data reveal?. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 26(2). 437–466. 4 indexed citations
8.
Nobel, J. Martijn, Ellen M. Kok, & Simon G. F. Robben. (2020). Redefining the structure of structured reporting in radiology. Insights into Imaging. 11(1). 10–10. 60 indexed citations
9.
Blissett, Sarah, Matthew Sibbald, Ellen M. Kok, & Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. (2018). Optimizing self-regulation of performance: is mental effort a cue?. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 23(5). 891–898. 17 indexed citations
10.
Zwaan, Laura, Ellen M. Kok, & Anouk van der Gijp. (2017). Radiology education: a radiology curriculum for all medical students?. Diagnosis. 4(3). 185–189. 18 indexed citations
11.
Kok, Ellen M., et al.. (2017). Teaching Systematic Viewing to Final-Year Medical Students Improves Systematicity but Not Coverage or Detection of Radiologic Abnormalities. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 14(2). 235–241. 23 indexed citations
12.
Kok, Ellen M., et al.. (2017). Does the Use of a Checklist Help Medical Students in the Detection of Abnormalities on a Chest Radiograph?. Journal of Digital Imaging. 30(6). 726–731. 18 indexed citations
13.
Kok, Ellen M., et al.. (2017). What We Do and Do Not Know about Teaching Medical Image Interpretation. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 309–309. 25 indexed citations
14.
Kok, Ellen M. & Halszka Jarodzka. (2016). Before your very eyes: the value and limitations of eye tracking in medical education. Medical Education. 51(1). 114–122. 90 indexed citations
15.
Gegenfurtner, Andreas, et al.. (2016). The challenges of studying visual expertise in medical image diagnosis. Medical Education. 51(1). 97–104. 39 indexed citations
16.
Kok, Ellen M., Anique B. H. de Bruin, Jimmie Leppink, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, & Simon G. F. Robben. (2015). Case Comparisons. Academic Radiology. 22(10). 1226–1235. 17 indexed citations
17.
Kok, Ellen M., et al.. (2015). Systematic viewing in radiology: seeing more, missing less?. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 21(1). 189–205. 81 indexed citations
18.
Leppink, Jimmie, Ellen M. Kok, Esther M. Bergman, Mariëtte H. van Loon, & Anique B. H. de Bruin. (2015). Four Common Pitfalls of Quantitative Analysis in Experimental Research. Academic Medicine. 91(6). 891–891. 6 indexed citations
19.
Bruin, Anique B. H. de, Ellen M. Kok, Jimmie Leppink, & Gino Camp. (2014). It might happen in the very beginning. Reply to Ericsson. Intelligence. 45. 107–108. 2 indexed citations
20.
Loon, Mariëtte H. van, et al.. (2013). AM Last Page. Academic Medicine. 88(10). 1588–1588. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026