Elizabeth Roe
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Jonathan MijsJohn R. WeiszChristine WasangaAkash R. WasilKatherine E. Venturo‐ConerlyTom L. OsbornMicaela RodriguezJenny Gan
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers)Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyBehaviour Research and Therapy
- Partner nations
- United StatesKenyaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Roe
9 papers receiving 242 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Clinical Psychology 166
- Social Psychology 91
- Sociology and Political Science 48
- Applied Psychology 48
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 41
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Roe
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Roe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Roe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Roe. The network helps show where Elizabeth Roe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Roe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Roe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Roe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Roe. Elizabeth Roe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 90 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Integrating the Tellington TTouch method in guide dog training | 2 |
About Elizabeth Roe
Elizabeth Roe is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (48 citations), Clinical Psychology (166 citations) and Social Psychology (91 citations). Elizabeth Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Kenya and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Mijs, John R. Weisz, Christine Wasanga, Akash R. Wasil, Katherine E. Venturo‐Conerly, Tom L. Osborn, Micaela Rodriguez, Jenny Gan, Rebecca M. Shingleton and Jessica L. Schleider. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.