Elizabeth L. Johnson
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Robert T. KnightDavid A. GalloKatherine T. FosterKevin T. JonesMarian E. BerryhillSilvia A. BungeNathaniel G. MeadowAnne‐Kristin Solbakk
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (12 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth L. Johnson
46 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Cognitive Neuroscience 688
- Molecular Biology 243
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 173
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 123
- Plant Science 115
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth L. Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth L. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth L. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth L. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth L. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth L. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth L. Johnson. The network helps show where Elizabeth L. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth L. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth L. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth L. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth L. Johnson. Elizabeth L. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 61 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | Genetic algorithms as algorithm adversaries | 1 |
About Elizabeth L. Johnson
Elizabeth L. Johnson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (12 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (688 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (47 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (68 citations). Elizabeth L. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert T. Knight, David A. Gallo, Katherine T. Foster, Kevin T. Jones, Marian E. Berryhill, Silvia A. Bunge, Nathaniel G. Meadow, Anne‐Kristin Solbakk, Ron Brookmeyer and Sarah Barry. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, NeuroImage and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.