Elizabeth B. Gardner
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- J. Eduardo RameDaniel L. DriesClyde W. YancyKathleen H. TotoMark H. DraznerKatharine FastJordan M. PrutkinLaurie A. Lucchina
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth B. Gardner
17 papers receiving 550 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Cognitive Neuroscience 169
- Nutrition and Dietetics 155
- Sensory Systems 134
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 112
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth B. Gardner
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth B. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth B. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth B. Gardner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth B. Gardner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth B. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth B. Gardner. The network helps show where Elizabeth B. Gardner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth B. Gardner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth B. Gardner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth B. Gardner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth B. Gardner. Elizabeth B. Gardner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 73 | |
| 3 | 68 | |
| 4 | 145 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 96 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 67 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 7 |
About Elizabeth B. Gardner
Elizabeth B. Gardner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 605 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (134 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (155 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (169 citations). Elizabeth B. Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include J. Eduardo Rame, Daniel L. Dries, Clyde W. Yancy, Kathleen H. Toto, Mark H. Drazner, Katharine Fast, Jordan M. Prutkin, Laurie A. Lucchina, Valerie B. Duffy and James M. Weiffenbach. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychologia, Experimental Neurology and American Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.