Élise Morice
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Marika Nosten‐BertrandBruno GirosCécile V. DenisElizabeth FisherLesley VanesVictor L. J. TybulewiczFlavie MathieuCatalina Betancur
- Topics
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of NeuroscienceBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Élise Morice
12 papers receiving 567 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 264
- Molecular Biology 258
- Genetics 168
- Cognitive Neuroscience 115
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 100
Countries citing papers authored by Élise Morice
This map shows the geographic impact of Élise Morice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Élise Morice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Élise Morice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Élise Morice
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Élise Morice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Élise Morice. The network helps show where Élise Morice may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Élise Morice
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Élise Morice. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Élise Morice based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Élise Morice. Élise Morice is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 69 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 75 | |
| 9 | 112 | |
| 10 | 94 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 58 | |
| 13 | 25 |
About Élise Morice
Élise Morice is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Genetics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (264 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (47 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (23 citations). Élise Morice has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marika Nosten‐Bertrand, Bruno Giros, Cécile V. Denis, Elizabeth Fisher, Lesley Vanes, Victor L. J. Tybulewicz, Flavie Mathieu, Catalina Betancur, Jean‐Marie Billard and Jacques Epelbaum. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.