Tim Kenyon

507 citations
19 papers · 152 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Kenyon

19 papers receiving 122 citations

Peers

Tim Kenyon
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • General Decision Sciences 12
  • Philosophy 64
  • History and Philosophy of Science 11
  • Family Practice 5
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 29
Replace Kristoffer Ahlstrom‐Vij with:
Kristoffer Ahlstrom‐Vij United Kingdom
John Biro United States
Leonard Shlain
Ezra Talmor Israel
Chris Ranalli Netherlands
Dennis J. Schmidt United States
Joseph Brent United States
Wolfram Karl Köck
Werner Hüllen Germany
Monique Mémet France
Tim Kenyon relative to Kristoffer Ahlstrom‐Vij United Kingdom Kristoffer Ahlstrom‐Vij's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Kristoffer Ahlstrom‐Vij · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Kenyon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Kenyon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Kenyon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Kenyon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Kenyon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Kenyon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Kenyon. The network helps show where Tim Kenyon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Tim Kenyon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Kenyon Line = papers co-authored together Tim Kenyon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201437
2 201427
3 201213
4 200310
5 20108
6 20167
7 20067
8 20167
9
Clear Thinking in a Blurry World
20087
10
Cynical Assertion: Convention, Pragmatics, and Saying "Uncle"
20036
11
A Logical Approach to Philosophy: Essays in Memory of Graham Solomon
20064
12 20144
13 20154
14 19993
15 20162
16 19992
17 20132
18
Commentary on ‘Levels of Depth in Deep Disagreement’
20161
19 20111

About Tim Kenyon

Tim Kenyon is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 19 papers that have together received 152 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (1 paper) and Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (12 citations), Philosophy (64 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations), Family Practice (5 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (29 citations). Tim Kenyon has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter C. Stirling and G. D. Stubley. Their work appears in journals such as Mind & Language, Synthese, Informal Logic, Pacific philosophical quarterly and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact