Elia Zardini

1.1k total citations
37 papers, 411 citations indexed

About

Elia Zardini is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Elia Zardini has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 411 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Philosophy, 20 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 15 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Elia Zardini's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (21 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (20 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (15 papers). Elia Zardini is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (21 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (20 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (15 papers). Elia Zardini collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Russia. Elia Zardini's co-authors include Dan López de and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Synthese.

In The Last Decade

Elia Zardini

37 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Elia Zardini
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 278
  • Philosophy 239
  • Artificial Intelligence 209
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 98
  • History and Philosophy of Science 81
Replace Andrew Bacon with:
Andrew Bacon United States
Bradley Armour‐Garb United States
A. J. Cotnoir United Kingdom
Gillian Russell United States
Agustín Rayo United States
Rosanna Keefe United Kingdom
Michael Glanzberg United States
Allen Hazen Australia
Volker Halbach United Kingdom
Gabriel Uzquiano United States
Andrew Bacon United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Elia Zardini
Elia Zardini · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Elia Zardini
Elia Zardini · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Elia Zardini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elia Zardini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elia Zardini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elia Zardini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elia Zardini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elia Zardini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elia Zardini. The network helps show where Elia Zardini may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elia Zardini

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elia Zardini. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elia Zardini based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elia Zardini. Elia Zardini is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 1
3 8
4
First-Order Tolerant Logics
1
5 3
6 2
7 2
8 3
9 24
10 15
11 1
12 10
13
Two Diamonds Are More Than One Transitivity and the Factivity of Feasible Knowability
1
14 25
15 88
16 13
17 13
18 3
19 9
20
Contribuciones para una monografía del género Conyza Less., 1.
2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026