Elena De Marchi
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Physiology top 0.1%
- Immunology top 5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Elena AdinolfiPaolo PintonAngela BononiMassimo BonoraCarlotta GiorgiSimone PatergnaniFrancesco Di VirgilioAlessandro Rimessi
- Topics
- Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (26 papers)Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (9 papers)Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNature reviews. CancerBlood
- Partner nations
- ItalyPolandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Elena De Marchi
47 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Molecular Biology 2.6k
- Physiology 1.3k
- Immunology 599
- Epidemiology 595
- Physiology 422
Countries citing papers authored by Elena De Marchi
This map shows the geographic impact of Elena De Marchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elena De Marchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elena De Marchi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elena De Marchi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elena De Marchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elena De Marchi. The network helps show where Elena De Marchi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elena De Marchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elena De Marchi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elena De Marchi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elena De Marchi. Elena De Marchi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 149 | |
| 12 | 85 | |
| 13 | 115 | |
| 14 | 79 | |
| 15 | 370 | |
| 16 | 385 | |
| 17 | ATP synthesis and storagebreakdown → | 431 |
| 18 | 74 | |
| 19 | 201 | |
| 20 | Les chasseurs de poisons d'El-Hosh (Haute Egypte): l'art rupestre le plus ancient de la vallée du Nil | 1 |
About Elena De Marchi
Elena De Marchi is a scholar working on Physiology, Biological Psychiatry and Speech and Hearing, having authored 51 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (26 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (9 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.3k citations), Biological Psychiatry (119 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.6k citations). Elena De Marchi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Poland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elena Adinolfi, Paolo Pinton, Angela Bononi, Massimo Bonora, Carlotta Giorgi, Simone Patergnani, Francesco Di Virgilio, Alessandro Rimessi, Saverio Marchi and Mariusz R. Wiȩckowski. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nature reviews. Cancer and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.