Elaine M. Cham
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Amy A. Ernst (5 shared papers)Todd G. Nick (3 shared papers)Steven J. Weiss (2 shared papers)Louise Hall (3 shared papers)Beth S. Ruben (1 shared paper)Thomas L. Cibull (1 shared paper)Bruce Robert Smoller (1 shared paper)Dawn H. Siegel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Violence and Victims (3 papers)Acta Neuropathologica Communications (2 papers)Brain Pathology (2 papers)Acta Neuropathologica (1 paper)The American Journal of Human Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Elaine M. Cham
23 papers receiving 612 citations
Elaine M. Cham's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Health 119
- Genetics 135
- Genetics 164
- Neurology 79
- Clinical Biochemistry 24
Countries citing papers authored by Elaine M. Cham
This map shows the geographic impact of Elaine M. Cham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elaine M. Cham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elaine M. Cham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elaine M. Cham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elaine M. Cham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elaine M. Cham. The network helps show where Elaine M. Cham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elaine M. Cham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project Baby Bear: Rapid precision care incorporating rWGS in 5 California children’s hospitals demonstrates improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs of care Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 193 |
| 2 | 2003 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 51 | |
| 4 | Awareness and use of over-the-counter pain medications: a survey of emergency department patients. | 2002 | 50 |
| 5 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 46 | |
| 8 | Comparison of three instruments for assessing ongoing intimate partner violence. | 2002 | 22 |
| 9 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 5 |
About Elaine M. Cham
Elaine M. Cham is a scholar working on Genetics, Health, Oncology, Demography and Neurology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (3 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (3 papers), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Cardiac tumors and thrombi (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (119 citations), Genetics (135 citations), Genetics (164 citations), Neurology (79 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (24 citations). Elaine M. Cham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Amy A. Ernst, Todd G. Nick, Steven J. Weiss, Louise Hall, Beth S. Ruben, Thomas L. Cibull, Bruce Robert Smoller, Dawn H. Siegel, Thomas A. Victor and Winston W. Huh. Their work appears in journals such as Violence and Victims, Acta Neuropathologica Communications, Brain Pathology, Acta Neuropathologica and The American Journal of Human Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.