Edwin van der Zaag

1.0k total citations
7 papers, 146 citations indexed

About

Edwin van der Zaag is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Edwin van der Zaag has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 146 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Edwin van der Zaag's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers). Edwin van der Zaag is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers). Edwin van der Zaag collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Greece and Curacao. Edwin van der Zaag's co-authors include Willem A. Bemelman, M. S. Vlug, Huib A. Cense, Dirk T. Ubbink, Jan Wind, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, C Verberne, Eric R. Manusama, Edwin R. van den Heuvel and I Grossmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, Annals of Oncology and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Edwin van der Zaag

4 papers receiving 142 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edwin van der Zaag Netherlands 3 95 91 45 44 19 7 146
Nuria Truán Spain 5 101 1.1× 89 1.0× 22 0.5× 33 0.8× 13 0.7× 6 146
Michael P.M. de Neree tot Babberich Netherlands 8 163 1.7× 85 0.9× 36 0.8× 89 2.0× 13 0.7× 10 205
Katherine Pearson United Kingdom 4 122 1.3× 148 1.6× 32 0.7× 35 0.8× 8 0.4× 6 194
M Škrovina Czechia 8 116 1.2× 110 1.2× 25 0.6× 39 0.9× 4 0.2× 36 167
Brendan Bebington South Africa 7 44 0.5× 61 0.7× 14 0.3× 17 0.4× 12 0.6× 18 107
Peter D. de Rooij Netherlands 6 95 1.0× 130 1.4× 13 0.3× 88 2.0× 23 1.2× 10 193
Alessandra Cristaudi Switzerland 7 57 0.6× 124 1.4× 23 0.5× 41 0.9× 9 0.5× 24 181
P.M. van Schaik Netherlands 7 68 0.7× 52 0.6× 37 0.8× 73 1.7× 15 0.8× 10 144
Mauro Totis Italy 4 72 0.8× 58 0.6× 20 0.4× 25 0.6× 9 0.5× 9 106
Tadas Latkauskas Lithuania 8 188 2.0× 212 2.3× 21 0.5× 45 1.0× 11 0.6× 14 272

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin van der Zaag

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin van der Zaag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin van der Zaag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin van der Zaag more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin van der Zaag

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin van der Zaag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin van der Zaag. The network helps show where Edwin van der Zaag may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edwin van der Zaag

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edwin van der Zaag. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edwin van der Zaag based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edwin van der Zaag. Edwin van der Zaag is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Klaveren, David van, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Hester F. Lingsma, et al.. (2025). 252. ACCURACY OF PREDICTING RESIDUAL DISEASE AND DISEASE PROGRESSION DURING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER. Diseases of the Esophagus. 38(Supplement_1).
2.
Wilk, Berend J. van der, Ben M. Eyck, Bas P. L. Wijnhoven, et al.. (2023). LBA75 Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer (SANO-trial): A phase-III stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Annals of Oncology. 34. S1317–S1317. 26 indexed citations
3.
Veld, Joyce, Femke J. Amelung, Wernard A. A. Borstlap, et al.. (2020). 177 DECOMPRESSING STOMA VERSUS EMERGENCY RESECTION FOR LEFT-SIDED OBSTRUCTIVE COLON CANCER: A NATIONWIDE, PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED STUDY. Gastroenterology. 158(6). S–1496.
4.
Veld, Joyce, Femke J. Amelung, Wernard A. A. Borstlap, et al.. (2020). 897 RISK-STRATIFIED COMPARISON OF BRIDGE TO SURGERY APPROACHES VERSUS EMERGENCY RESECTION IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT-SIDED OBSTRUCTIVE COLON CANCER: A NATIONWIDE STUDY. Gastroenterology. 158(6). S–1538.
5.
Verberne, C, Zhuozhao Zhan, Edwin R. van den Heuvel, et al.. (2015). Intensified follow-up in colorectal cancer patients using frequent Carcino-Embryonic Antigen (CEA) measurements and CEA-triggered imaging: Results of the randomized “CEAwatch” trial. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 41(9). 1188–1196. 59 indexed citations
6.
Engelsman, Anton F., et al.. (2012). Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation as a Presenting Symptom of Metastasized Carcinoid Tumor. Case Reports in Gastroenterology. 6(3). 643–649. 1 indexed citations
7.
Vlug, M. S., Jan Wind, Edwin van der Zaag, et al.. (2008). Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Disease. 11(4). 335–343. 60 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026