Hans De Wilt

2.1k total citations
8 papers, 105 citations indexed

About

Hans De Wilt is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Hans De Wilt has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 105 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Hans De Wilt's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). Hans De Wilt is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). Hans De Wilt collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and Belgium. Hans De Wilt's co-authors include G. H. H. Mannaerts, Tom M. Karsten, P. Willemsen, Erwin van der Harst, Juliette Slieker, Niels Komen, Johan F. Lange, Piet Pattyn, Willem van Leeuwen and Hans Jeekel and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of Clinical Pathology.

In The Last Decade

Hans De Wilt

8 papers receiving 99 citations

Peers

Hans De Wilt

ONCOL

SURGE

CCM

PRM

MB

Nuria Truán Spain

Lin Zhong China

Heena Bidd United Kingdom

Charles R. Vasquez United States

Mauro Totis Italy

P Coe United Kingdom

Maximilian Scheiterle Italy

Luis-Cristóbal Capitán-Morales Spain

Jessica Gough United Kingdom

Tsuyoshi Isawa Japan

Nuria Truán Spain

Hans De Wilt

101 ×1.2

ONCOL

89 ×1.3

SURGE

22 ×0.5

CCM

33 ×1.8

PRM

15 ×1.4

MB

Citations per year, relative to Hans De Wilt Hans De Wilt (= 1×) peers Nuria Truán

Countries citing papers authored by Hans De Wilt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hans De Wilt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans De Wilt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans De Wilt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hans De Wilt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans De Wilt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans De Wilt. The network helps show where Hans De Wilt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans De Wilt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans De Wilt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans De Wilt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans De Wilt. Hans De Wilt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Wilt, Hans De, et al.. (2022). The quest for outpatient mastectomy in COVID-19 era: facilitators and barriers.. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 48(2). e89–e89. 1 indexed citations

2.

Brandt‐Kerkhof, Alexandra R. M., Jacobus W. A. Burger, Andreas J. A. Bremers, et al.. (2022). Survival Outcomes after Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in patients with Synchronous versus Metachronous onset of Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Carcinoma. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 48(2). e35–e36. 2 indexed citations

3.

Bult, Peter, et al.. (2018). Molecular subtypes in inflammatory breast cancer: A descriptive analysis using the Netherlands cancer registry. European Journal of Cancer. 92. S120–S121. 1 indexed citations

4.

Halilović, Altuna, Margrethe Schlooz-Vries, Oliver B. Boelens, et al.. (2017). Brief fixation enables same-day breast cancer diagnosis with reliable assessment of hormone receptors, E-cadherin and HER2/Neu. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 70(9). 781–786. 8 indexed citations

5.

Komen, Niels, Juliette Slieker, P. Willemsen, et al.. (2014). Acute phase proteins in drain fluid: a new screening tool for colorectal anastomotic leakage? The APPEAL study: analysis of parameters predictive for evident anastomotic leakage. The American Journal of Surgery. 208(3). 317–323. 37 indexed citations

6.

Komen, Niels, Juliette Slieker, P. Willemsen, et al.. (2014). Polymerase chain reaction for Enterococcus faecalis in drain fluid: the first screening test for symptomatic colorectal anastomotic leakage. 5 indexed citations

7.

Komen, Niels, Juliette Slieker, P. Willemsen, et al.. (2013). Polymerase chain reaction for Enterococcus faecalis in drain fluid: the first screening test for symptomatic colorectal anastomotic leakage. The Appeal-study: Analysis of Parameters Predictive for Evident Anastomotic Leakage. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 29(1). 15–21. 40 indexed citations

8.

Marijnen, Corrie A.M., Hans De Wilt, Margot Tesselaar, et al.. (2008). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimen with capecitabine and bevacizumab in locally advanced rectal cancer: A feasibility study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG). Journal of Clinical Oncology. 26(15_suppl). 15040–15040. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact