Huib A. Cense
- Surgery top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Willem A. BemelmanDirk T. UbbinkJan WindBart A. van WagensveldMiguel A. CuestaMarkus W. HollmannAlexander EngelAnna A. W. van Geloven
- Topics
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (7 papers)Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (6 papers)Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGreeceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Huib A. Cense
36 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Surgery 1.4k
- Oncology 502
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 469
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 389
- Physiology 120
Countries citing papers authored by Huib A. Cense
This map shows the geographic impact of Huib A. Cense's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Huib A. Cense with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Huib A. Cense more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Huib A. Cense
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Huib A. Cense. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Huib A. Cense. The network helps show where Huib A. Cense may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Huib A. Cense
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Huib A. Cense. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Huib A. Cense based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Huib A. Cense. Huib A. Cense is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trialbreakdown → | 348 |
| 9 | Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. | 19 |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | Bariatrische chirurgie met een variabele maagband; langetermijn follow-up van eerste 30 patienten in Nederland | 1 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Laparoscopy in Combination with Fast Track Multimodal Management is the Best Perioperative Strategy in Patients Undergoing Colonic Surgerybreakdown → | 566 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 63 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Huib A. Cense
Huib A. Cense is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacy and Emergency Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (7 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (6 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (1.4k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (469 citations) and Oncology (502 citations). Huib A. Cense has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Greece and United States. Frequent co-authors include Willem A. Bemelman, Dirk T. Ubbink, Jan Wind, Bart A. van Wagensveld, Miguel A. Cuesta, Markus W. Hollmann, Alexander Engel, Anna A. W. van Geloven, Malaika S. Vlug and Edwin S. van der Zaag. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Annals of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.