Jeffrey S. Reber
- General Psychology top 5%
- Health top 10%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 5
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 2
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Communication in Education and Healthcare 3
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs 2
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 3
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 2
-
- Online and Blended Learning 3
- Education and Critical Thinking Development 2
- Co-authors
- Brent D. SlifeFrank C. RichardsonEdwin E. GanttLisa M. OsbeckRobert D. RidgeJulie A. NelsonAlan L. Wilkins
- Cited by
- General PsychologyHealthPhilosophy
- Journals
- Basic and Applied Social Psychology (1 paper)Theory & Psychology (1 paper)Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jeffrey S. Reber
16 papers receiving 195 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- General Psychology 44
- Health 59
- Philosophy 64
- Social Psychology 111
- Clinical Psychology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey S. Reber
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey S. Reber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey S. Reber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey S. Reber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey S. Reber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey S. Reber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey S. Reber. The network helps show where Jeffrey S. Reber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jeffrey S. Reber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 13 | Social Psychology: Key Issues, Assumptions, and Implications. | 2005 | 10 |
| 14 | Critical Thinking about Psychology: Hidden Assumptions and Plausible Alternatives | 2005 | 105 |
| 15 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 16 | Comparing the Practical Implications of Secular and Christian Truth in Psychotherapy | 1999 | 2 |
| 17 | 1999 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 4 |
About Jeffrey S. Reber
Jeffrey S. Reber is a scholar working on General Psychology, Health and Philosophy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (44 citations), Health (59 citations) and Philosophy (64 citations). Jeffrey S. Reber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brent D. Slife, Frank C. Richardson, Edwin E. Gantt, Lisa M. Osbeck, Robert D. Ridge, Julie A. Nelson and Alan L. Wilkins. Their work appears in journals such as Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Theory & Psychology and Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.