Charlotte Schwartz
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Morris S. SchwartzMarian Radke YarrowLeila Calhoun DeasyJohn A. ClausenJanice C. LevyAlfred H. StantonLee BrauerM. Harvey Brenner
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers)Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (3 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryAmerican Journal of Public HealthAmerican Journal of Sociology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Charlotte Schwartz
18 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 160
- Sociology and Political Science 128
- Social Psychology 98
- General Health Professions 84
- Psychiatry and Mental health 58
Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte Schwartz. The network helps show where Charlotte Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charlotte Schwartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charlotte Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charlotte Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charlotte Schwartz. Charlotte Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | Normalization and idealism. | 2 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 143 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 125 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Charlotte Schwartz
Charlotte Schwartz is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (3 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (160 citations), General Psychology (7 citations) and Social Psychology (98 citations). Charlotte Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Morris S. Schwartz, Marian Radke Yarrow, Leila Calhoun Deasy, John A. Clausen, Janice C. Levy, Alfred H. Stanton, Lee Brauer, M. Harvey Brenner, J. D. Myers and Donald C. Riedel. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, American Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.