Edward T. Auer

2.5k citations
55 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Edward T. Auer

55 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Edward T. Auer
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 447
  • Sensory Systems 131
  • Signal Processing 168
Replace Ralph N. Ohde with:
Ralph N. Ohde United States
Adrian Fourcin United Kingdom
Lucie Ménard Canada
Rosalie M. Uchanski United States
Christian Kroos Australia
Lisa D. Sanders United States
Marios Fourakis United States
Akiko Callan Japan
Michelle R. Molis United States
Martina Huss United Kingdom
Edward T. Auer relative to Ralph N. Ohde United States Ralph N. Ohde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ralph N. Ohde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward T. Auer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward T. Auer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward T. Auer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward T. Auer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward T. Auer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward T. Auer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward T. Auer. The network helps show where Edward T. Auer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward T. Auer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward T. Auer Line = papers co-authored together Edward T. Auer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999189
2 2000188
3 2007140
4 2004126
5 200793
6 200289
7 200287
8 200787
9 199768
10 200158
11 199850
12 200246
13 201343
14 200539
15 200239
16 201427
17 200723
18 200923
19 200022
20 201321

About Edward T. Auer

Edward T. Auer is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Social Psychology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (33 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (18 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (17 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (9 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (8 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (5 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (447 citations), Sensory Systems (131 citations) and Signal Processing (168 citations). Edward T. Auer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lynne E. Bernstein, Paul A. Luce, Michael S. Vitevitch, Manbir Singh, Sumiko Takayanagi, David B. Pisoni, Curtis W. Ponton, Stephen D. Goldinger, Jintao Jiang and Witaya Sungkarat. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Neuroreport, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Speech Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact