Edward R. Grover
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 5
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 1
-
- Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications 6
- Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation 2
- Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies 2
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 2
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms 2
-
- Fuel Cells and Related Materials 2
- Co-authors
- Michael E. SwartzJeffrey R. MazzeoJames D. WuestJohn S. PetersenPhyllis R. BrownSusumu HondaAtsushi TagaJeff R. Mazzeo
- Journals
- Journal of Chromatography A (5 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (2 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSaudi ArabiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Edward R. Grover
10 papers receiving 333 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Spectroscopy 210
- Biomedical Engineering 214
- Organic Chemistry 83
- Bioengineering 14
- Analytical Chemistry 14
Countries citing papers authored by Edward R. Grover
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward R. Grover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward R. Grover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward R. Grover more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward R. Grover
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward R. Grover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward R. Grover. The network helps show where Edward R. Grover may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Edward R. Grover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 29 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 41 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 23 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 23 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 94 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 82 | |
| 11 | 1976 | 0 |
About Edward R. Grover
Edward R. Grover is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Pharmaceutical Science and Electrochemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (2 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (2 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (2 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (2 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (210 citations), Biomedical Engineering (214 citations) and Organic Chemistry (83 citations). Edward R. Grover has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Swartz, Jeffrey R. Mazzeo, James D. Wuest, John S. Petersen, Phyllis R. Brown, Susumu Honda, Atsushi Taga, Jeff R. Mazzeo, Hassan Y. Aboul‐Enein and Richard Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Tetrahedron Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Analytical Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.