Edward M. Cook
- Religious studies top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Archeology top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Darrett B. RutmanC. L. SeowRobert ZemskyKlaus BeyerKenneth A. LockridgeJohn F. HealeyCarville EarleJohn J. Waters
- Topics
- Archaeology and Historical Studies (13 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (11 papers)Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Religious studiesArcheologyHistory
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edward M. Cook
27 papers receiving 94 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Religious studies 45
- Sociology and Political Science 44
- Archeology 44
- Political Science and International Relations 23
- Economics and Econometrics 15
Countries citing papers authored by Edward M. Cook
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward M. Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward M. Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward M. Cook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward M. Cook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward M. Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward M. Cook. The network helps show where Edward M. Cook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward M. Cook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward M. Cook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward M. Cook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward M. Cook. Edward M. Cook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | The non-biblical texts from Qumran | 1 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | The Septuagint of Proverbs: Jewish And/or Hellenistic Proverbs? : Concerning the Hellenistic Colouring of Lxx Proverbs | 12 |
| 12 | Solving the Mysteries of the Dead Sea Scrolls: New Light on the Bible | 1 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Edward M. Cook
Edward M. Cook is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 136 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (13 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (11 papers) and Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (45 citations), Archeology (44 citations) and History (14 citations). Edward M. Cook has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Darrett B. Rutman, C. L. Seow, Robert Zemsky, Klaus Beyer, Kenneth A. Lockridge, John F. Healey, Carville Earle, John J. Waters, Martin G. Abegg and Douglas L. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Political Science Quarterly and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.