Edward C. Thaden
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 5%
- Philosophy
- Anthropology
- Co-authors
- Marc RaeffRichard A. PierceHugh Seton‐WatsonSamuel H. BaronGeorge VernadskyАндреас КаппелерRobert H. McNealJames W. Long
- Topics
- Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (8 papers)Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers)European Cultural and National Identity (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edward C. Thaden
27 papers receiving 113 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Political Science and International Relations 124
- Sociology and Political Science 109
- History 27
- Philosophy 17
- Anthropology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Edward C. Thaden
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward C. Thaden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward C. Thaden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward C. Thaden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward C. Thaden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward C. Thaden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward C. Thaden. The network helps show where Edward C. Thaden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward C. Thaden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward C. Thaden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward C. Thaden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward C. Thaden. Edward C. Thaden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Historicism, N. A. Polevoi, and Rewriting Russian History | 1 |
| 2 | State and People in the History of Northern Norwegians and White Sea and Kola Russians | 0 |
| 3 | Interpreting history : collective essays on Russia's relations with Europe | 3 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | Conservative Nationalism in Nineteenth Century Russia | 25 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Edward C. Thaden
Edward C. Thaden is a scholar working on Archeology, Political Science and International Relations and Cultural Studies, having authored 48 papers that have together received 214 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (8 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers) and European Cultural and National Identity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (124 citations), History (27 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (109 citations). Edward C. Thaden has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc Raeff, Richard A. Pierce, Hugh Seton‐Watson, Samuel H. Baron, George Vernadsky, Андреас Каппелер, Robert H. McNeal, James W. Long, Serge A. Zenkovsky and Edward J. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Russian Review and The Slavic and East European Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.