Edna Ullmann‐Margalit

2.4k citations
33 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 14
Topics
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers)Legal and Constitutional Studies (5 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers)
Partner nations
IsraelUnited States

In The Last Decade

Edna Ullmann‐Margalit

29 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Edna Ullmann‐Margalit
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Economics and Econometrics 666
  • Sociology and Political Science 368
  • Political Science and International Relations 241
  • Law 226
  • Safety Research 170
Replace Lewis A. Kornhauser with:
Lewis A. Kornhauser United States
Laurence H. Tribe United States
Jeffrey Friedman United States
Mary K. Farmer United Kingdom
Christine Jolls United States
John T. Granrose United States
David Estlund United States
Richard H. McAdams United States
Richard A. Brody United States
David Teira Spain
Edna Ullmann‐Margalit relative to Lewis A. Kornhauser United States Lewis A. Kornhauser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lewis A. Kornhauser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edna Ullmann‐Margalit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edna Ullmann‐Margalit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna Ullmann‐Margalit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna Ullmann‐Margalit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edna Ullmann‐Margalit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna Ullmann‐Margalit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna Ullmann‐Margalit. The network helps show where Edna Ullmann‐Margalit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edna Ullmann‐Margalit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edna Ullmann‐Margalit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edna Ullmann‐Margalit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edna Ullmann‐Margalit. Edna Ullmann‐Margalit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 1
3 14
4 1
5 0
6 1
7
The Scientific Enterprise
2
8 1
9
Spotlight on Scroll scholars: dissecting the Qumran-Essene hypothesis
2
10 7
11 31
12 108
13 157
14 204
15
Isaiah Berlin: A celebration
40
16 4
17 4
18 1
19 2
20
The Emergence of Norms
444

About Edna Ullmann‐Margalit

Edna Ullmann‐Margalit is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Law and Philosophy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (5 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (68 citations), Economics and Econometrics (666 citations) and Law (226 citations). Edna Ullmann‐Margalit has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cass R. Sunstein, Avishai Margalit, Isaiah Berlín, Ruth Gavison and Adrian Piper. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and The Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026