E. Wong

25 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

E. Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Animal Science and Zoology 95
  • Biochemistry 45
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 67
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 93
  • Plant Science 171
Replace L.‐Å. Appelqvist with:
L.‐Å. Appelqvist Sweden
Angela Maurizi Italy
D. L. LAIDMAN Canada
Zbigniew Biały Poland
M. Steyn South Africa
A. A. Hildebrand Germany
V. H. Booth United Kingdom
Matthew C. Achilonu South Africa
J. Adda France
Chung May Wu United States
E. Wong relative to L.‐Å. Appelqvist Sweden L.‐Å. Appelqvist's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
L.‐Å. Appelqvist · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Wong. The network helps show where E. Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside E. Wong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Wong Line = papers co-authored together E. Wong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197585
2 197049
3 196847
4 196229
5 197727
6 196225
7 197124
8 196822
9 196218
10 197018
11 196917
12 197115
13 196315
14 197114
15 196313
16 196513
17 196513
18 196810
19 19677
20 19636

About E. Wong

E. Wong is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Agronomy and Crop Science and Biochemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytoestrogen effects and research (10 papers), Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (5 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (4 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Bioactive natural compounds (3 papers) and Plant Gene Expression Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (95 citations), Biochemistry (45 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (67 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (93 citations) and Plant Science (171 citations). E. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include CM Francis, Cecil B. Johnson, Leon N. Nixon, G. C. M. Latch, Hans Grisebach, D. S. Flux, Klaus Hahlbrock, R. W. Purchas, E. John Birch and Gillian Butler. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Tetrahedron Letters and Fortschritte der Chemie Organischer Naturstoffe/Fortschritte der Chemie organischer Naturstoffe/Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact