Ε. T. Grether
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Charles L. SchultzeGeorge J. SchwartzReavis CoxRoland S. VaileAlfred R. OxenfeldtJohn F. Cady
- Topics
- Merger and Competition Analysis (3 papers)Management, Economics, and Public Policy (2 papers)Management and Marketing Education (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ε. T. Grether
23 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Economics and Econometrics 157
- Marketing 117
- Strategy and Management 108
- Sociology and Political Science 74
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 64
Countries citing papers authored by Ε. T. Grether
This map shows the geographic impact of Ε. T. Grether's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ε. T. Grether with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ε. T. Grether more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ε. T. Grether
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ε. T. Grether. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ε. T. Grether. The network helps show where Ε. T. Grether may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ε. T. Grether
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ε. T. Grether. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ε. T. Grether based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ε. T. Grether. Ε. T. Grether is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | THE IMPACTS OF PRESENT DAY ANTITRUST POLICY ON THE ECONOMY | 0 |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 239 | |
| 5 | Marketing and the public interest : proceedings of a symposium | 1 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | Industrial Organization: Past History and Future Problems | 21 |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Marketing and public policy | 13 |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Ε. T. Grether
Ε. T. Grether is a scholar working on Marketing, Management of Technology and Innovation and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (3 papers), Management, Economics, and Public Policy (2 papers) and Management and Marketing Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (26 citations), Marketing (117 citations) and Public Administration (33 citations). Ε. T. Grether has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles L. Schultze, George J. Schwartz, Reavis Cox, Roland S. Vaile, Alfred R. Oxenfeldt and John F. Cady. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Journal of Marketing and Journal of Marketing Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.