Citations per year, relative to Frank H. Stephen Frank H. Stephen (= 1×)
peers
Thomas Palay
Countries citing papers authored by Frank H. Stephen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank H. Stephen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank H. Stephen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank H. Stephen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frank H. Stephen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank H. Stephen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank H. Stephen. The network helps show where Frank H. Stephen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank H. Stephen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank H. Stephen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank H. Stephen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frank H. Stephen. Frank H. Stephen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stephen, Frank H.. (2016). Bank Credit and the Labor-Managed Firm: Comment. American Economic Review. 70(4). 796–799.
Stephen, Frank H., David Urbano, & Esteban van Hemmen Almazor. (2011). The Responsiveness of Entrepreneurs to Working Time Regulations. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
4.
Stephen, Frank H.. (2008). Regulation of the Legal Professions of Regulation of Markets for Legal Services: Potential Implications of the Legal Services Act of 2007. European Business Law Review. 19(6). 1129–1139.2 indexed citations
5.
Stephen, Frank H. & Esteban van Hemmen Almazor. (2008). Laws, enforcement, legality and economic development. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 26(1). 37–53.1 indexed citations
Tata, Cyrus & Frank H. Stephen. (2006). 'Swings and Roundabouts' ’: Do Changes to the Structure of Legal Aid Remuneration Make a Real Difference to Criminal Case Management and Case Outcomes?. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 2006(8). 722–741.10 indexed citations
9.
Stephen, Frank H. & Cyrus Tata. (2006). Impact of the Introduction of Fixed Payments in Summary Criminal Legal Aid. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
10.
Garoupa, Nuno & Frank H. Stephen. (2004). Optimal Law Enforcement with Legal Aid. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
11.
Garoupa, Nuno & Frank H. Stephen. (2003). A Note on Optimal Law Enforcement with Legal Aid. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
12.
Love, James H. & Frank H. Stephen. (1997). Deregulation and professional boundaries: evidence from the English legal profession.3 indexed citations
Stephen, Frank H.. (1984). Firms, Organization and Labour : Approaches to the Economics of Work Organization. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).9 indexed citations
18.
Stephen, Frank H.. (1982). The performance of labor-managed firms. St Martin's Press eBooks.14 indexed citations
Stephen, Frank H., et al.. (1975). Reinvestment revisited. Journal of Business Research. 3(4). 373–374.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.