E. Otto Steinborn
- Applied Mathematics top 0.2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Numerical Analysis top 1%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 5%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ernst Joachim WenigerEckhard FilterHerbert H. H. HomeierJohannes GrotendorstI. EmaKlaus RuedenbergR. LópezP. Otto
- Topics
- Mathematical functions and polynomials (36 papers)Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (15 papers)Mathematical Approximation and Integration (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
E. Otto Steinborn
62 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Applied Mathematics 1.5k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
- Numerical Analysis 624
- Algebra and Number Theory 287
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 250
Countries citing papers authored by E. Otto Steinborn
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Otto Steinborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Otto Steinborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Otto Steinborn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Otto Steinborn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Otto Steinborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Otto Steinborn. The network helps show where E. Otto Steinborn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Otto Steinborn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Otto Steinborn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Otto Steinborn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Otto Steinborn. E. Otto Steinborn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 43 | |
| 9 | 73 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 134 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 89 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 74 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About E. Otto Steinborn
E. Otto Steinborn is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Numerical Analysis and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical functions and polynomials (36 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (15 papers) and Mathematical Approximation and Integration (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (1.5k citations), Numerical Analysis (624 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (287 citations). E. Otto Steinborn has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ernst Joachim Weniger, Eckhard Filter, Herbert H. H. Homeier, Johannes Grotendorst, I. Ema, Klaus Ruedenberg, R. López, P. Otto, David M. Silver and Walter B. England. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Computational Physics and Physical Review A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.