E. J. Roebuck

542 total citations
23 papers, 390 citations indexed

About

E. J. Roebuck is a scholar working on Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, E. J. Roebuck has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 390 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Oncology, 8 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 7 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in E. J. Roebuck's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (10 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers). E. J. Roebuck is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (10 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers). E. J. Roebuck collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. E. J. Roebuck's co-authors include B. S. Worthington, G. N. Holland, Rob Hawkes, W. S. Moore, A P Locker, Alastair G. Gale, F. M. Cole, A.R.M. Wilson, John D. Dow and CW Elston and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Thorax and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

E. J. Roebuck

22 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E. J. Roebuck United Kingdom	13	124	112	99	83	73	23	390
Jeffrey B. Mendel United States	9	190 1.5×	60 0.5×	36 0.4×	117 1.4×	42 0.6×	20	403
A.E. Holland United States	7	349 2.8×	83 0.7×	53 0.5×	168 2.0×	98 1.3×	16	663
Robert R. Shenk United States	10	170 1.4×	130 1.2×	231 2.3×	97 1.2×	153 2.1×	19	470
R. Waldo Powell United States	12	75 0.6×	84 0.8×	112 1.1×	65 0.8×	143 2.0×	18	363
Corrado Chiappa Italy	12	50 0.4×	87 0.8×	61 0.6×	66 0.8×	41 0.6×	22	302
Meltem Gülsün Türkiye	12	238 1.9×	38 0.3×	26 0.3×	254 3.1×	38 0.5×	20	461
Anthony Horsman United Kingdom	13	525 4.2×	61 0.5×	31 0.3×	91 1.1×	98 1.3×	16	829
B.B. Muir United Kingdom	13	66 0.5×	261 2.3×	108 1.1×	84 1.0×	89 1.2×	22	552
Paul Burrowes Canada	13	410 3.3×	80 0.7×	76 0.8×	478 5.8×	120 1.6×	23	836
Kazuaki Nakashima Japan	12	135 1.1×	54 0.5×	73 0.7×	161 1.9×	64 0.9×	41	416

Countries citing papers authored by E. J. Roebuck

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. J. Roebuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. J. Roebuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. J. Roebuck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. J. Roebuck

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. J. Roebuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. J. Roebuck. The network helps show where E. J. Roebuck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. J. Roebuck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. J. Roebuck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. J. Roebuck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. J. Roebuck. E. J. Roebuck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gale, Alastair G., et al.. (1994). <title>Breast screening: visual search and observer performance</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2166. 66–75. 6 indexed citations

Ellis, Ian O., M.H. Galea, A P Locker, et al.. (1993). Early experience in breast cancer screening: emphasis on development of protocols for triple assessment. The Breast. 2(3). 148–153. 21 indexed citations

Galea, M.H., et al.. (1992). Non-operative management of discrete palpable breast lumps in women over 35 years of age. The Breast. 1(3). 164–165. 1 indexed citations

Galea, M.H., et al.. (1992). Breast cancer screening: A benefit can be anticipated. The Breast. 1(3). 155–155. 2 indexed citations

Locker, A P, Peter C. Hanley, A.R.M. Wilson, et al.. (1990). Mammography in the pre-operative assessment and post-operative surveillance of patients treated by excision and radiotherapy for primary breast cancer. Clinical Radiology. 41(6). 388–391. 16 indexed citations

Locker, A P, et al.. (1989). Results from a seven-year programme of breast self-examination in 89,010 women. British Journal of Cancer. 60(3). 401–405. 38 indexed citations

Gale, Alastair G., et al.. (1987). Computer aids to mammographic diagnosis. British Journal of Radiology. 60(717). 887–891. 26 indexed citations

Dowle, C S, et al.. (1987). An evaluation of transmission spectroscopy (lightscanning) in the diagnosis of symptomatic breast lesions. Clinical Radiology. 38(4). 375–377. 13 indexed citations

Roebuck, E. J., et al.. (1987). Building or Extending a Hospital Department: Radiology a Path through the Planning Minefield (9). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 80(9). 577–583.

10.

Dowle, C S, C.W. Elston, E. J. Roebuck, et al.. (1987). Preliminary results of the Nottingham breast self-examination education programme. British journal of surgery. 74(3). 217–219. 17 indexed citations

11.

Roebuck, E. J.. (1986). Mammography and screening for breast cancer.. BMJ. 292(6515). 223.2–226. 18 indexed citations

12.

Hinton, C P, Michael R. Williams, E. J. Roebuck, & R.W. Blamey. (1986). A controlled trial of danazol in the treatment of multiple recurrent breast cysts. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 40(9). 368–370. 7 indexed citations

13.

Roebuck, E. J., et al.. (1986). Mammographic changes following radiotherapy. British Journal of Radiology. 59(700). 337–344. 31 indexed citations

14.

Hinton, C P, Michael R. Williams, E. J. Roebuck, et al.. (1984). The relationship of background mammographic pattern to hormone dependency in breast cancer. British journal of surgery. 71(5). 357–359. 2 indexed citations

15.

Kean, D. M., B. S. Worthington, B. J. Preston, et al.. (1983). Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: examples of normal anatomy and pathology. British Journal of Radiology. 56(666). 355–364. 38 indexed citations

16.

Roebuck, E. J.. (1982). The importance of mammographic parenchymal patterns. British Journal of Radiology. 55(654). 387–398. 12 indexed citations

17.

Hawkes, Rob, G. N. Holland, W. S. Moore, E. J. Roebuck, & B. S. Worthington. (1981). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Tomography of the Normal Heart. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 5(5). 605–612. 56 indexed citations

18.

Talbot, Steven R., B. S. Worthington, & E. J. Roebuck. (1973). Radiographic signs of pulmonary embolism and pulmonary infarction. Thorax. 28(2). 198–203. 21 indexed citations

19.

Gammal, Taher El, E. J. Roebuck, G. H. du Boulay, & R. D. Hoare. (1967). Further Causes of Hypertrophied Tentorial Arteries. British Journal of Radiology. 40(473). 350–357. 12 indexed citations

20.

Dow, John D., E. J. Roebuck, & F. M. Cole. (1966). Dissecting Aneurysms of the Aorta. British Journal of Radiology. 39(468). 915–927. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact