A.E. Kirkpatrick

695 total citations
25 papers, 554 citations indexed

About

A.E. Kirkpatrick is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, A.E. Kirkpatrick has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 554 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Oncology, 8 papers in Cancer Research and 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in A.E. Kirkpatrick's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (14 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 papers). A.E. Kirkpatrick is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (14 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 papers). A.E. Kirkpatrick collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Australia. A.E. Kirkpatrick's co-authors include B.B. Muir, J.S. Walsh, Elaine Anderson, A P M Forrest, Thomas Anderson, M M Roberts, J Lamb, J Chamberlain, Sue Moss and Louise Johns and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Radiology and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

A.E. Kirkpatrick

24 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A.E. Kirkpatrick United Kingdom	12	389	185	152	112	83	25	554
B.B. Muir United Kingdom	13	261 0.7×	108 0.6×	89 0.6×	86 0.8×	84 1.0×	22	552
B. F. Sigfússon Sweden	9	733 1.9×	195 1.1×	118 0.8×	80 0.7×	82 1.0×	11	914
J.H.C.L. Hendriks Netherlands	9	378 1.0×	239 1.3×	215 1.4×	90 0.8×	94 1.1×	21	639
M Wallis United Kingdom	13	249 0.6×	137 0.7×	133 0.9×	193 1.7×	139 1.7×	31	505
J Lamb United Kingdom	10	256 0.7×	260 1.4×	278 1.8×	63 0.6×	32 0.4×	11	465
B. Séradour France	11	357 0.9×	134 0.7×	77 0.5×	122 1.1×	109 1.3×	36	496
Irma Saarenmaa Finland	12	260 0.7×	98 0.5×	83 0.5×	86 0.8×	111 1.3×	15	385
C B Stelling United States	10	121 0.3×	80 0.4×	128 0.8×	62 0.6×	57 0.7×	16	350
Todd E. Wilson United States	15	205 0.5×	146 0.8×	197 1.3×	203 1.8×	158 1.9×	20	651
TJ Anderson United Kingdom	7	408 1.0×	220 1.2×	106 0.7×	31 0.3×	48 0.6×	8	548

Countries citing papers authored by A.E. Kirkpatrick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.E. Kirkpatrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.E. Kirkpatrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.E. Kirkpatrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.E. Kirkpatrick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.E. Kirkpatrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.E. Kirkpatrick. The network helps show where A.E. Kirkpatrick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.E. Kirkpatrick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.E. Kirkpatrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.E. Kirkpatrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.E. Kirkpatrick. A.E. Kirkpatrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Anderson, Elaine, B.B. Muir, J.S. Walsh, & A.E. Kirkpatrick. (1994). The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening. Clinical Radiology. 49(4). 248–251. 117 indexed citations

Procter, Rob, et al.. (1994). User interface design and data management for digital mass mammographic screening. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 415–422. 1 indexed citations

Moss, Sue, D Coleman, R Ellman, et al.. (1993). Interval cancers and sensitivity in the screening centres of the UK trial of early detection of breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer. 29(2). 255–258. 22 indexed citations

Chamberlain, J, Sue Moss, A.E. Kirkpatrick, MJ Michell, & Louise Johns. (1993). National Health Service breast screening programme results for 1991-2.. BMJ. 307(6900). 353–356. 82 indexed citations

Kirkpatrick, A.E., et al.. (1990). Mammographic screening for breast cancer: recall rates using two views compared with the oblique view alone. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 44(6). 213–215. 2 indexed citations

Moss, J.G., et al.. (1990). Comparison of temperature profiles (devetherm) and conventional venography in suspected lower limb thrombosis. Clinical Radiology. 42(1). 37–39. 6 indexed citations

McKenzie, L., et al.. (1990). A mobile breast screening project in Scotland: Lessons learned for national screening. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 5(3). 201–213. 3 indexed citations

Law, J. Adam & A.E. Kirkpatrick. (1990). Further comparisons of films, screens and cassettes for mammography. British Journal of Radiology. 63(746). 128–131. 6 indexed citations

Aitken, Robert, H. L. MacDonald, A.E. Kirkpatrick, et al.. (1990). Outcome of surgery for non-palpable mammographic abnormalities. British journal of surgery. 77(6). 673–676. 22 indexed citations

10.

Dent, D M, A.E. Kirkpatrick, Euphemia McGoogan, U Chetty, & Thomas Anderson. (1989). Stereotaxic localisation and aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions. Clinical Radiology. 40(4). 380–382. 20 indexed citations

11.

Law, J. Adam & A.E. Kirkpatrick. (1988). Film processing for mammography. British Journal of Radiology. 61(730). 939–942. 8 indexed citations

12.

Kirkpatrick, A.E. & J. Adam Law. (1987). A comparative study of films and screens for mammography. British Journal of Radiology. 60(709). 73–78. 15 indexed citations

13.

Boot, D. A., et al.. (1987). Computed tomogram myelography in cervical spondylosis. International Orthopaedics. 11(3). 249–254. 4 indexed citations

14.

Anderson, Thomas, F E Alexander, U Chetty, et al.. (1986). COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY OF PREVALENT AND INCIDENT CANCERS DETECTED BY BREAST SCREENING. The Lancet. 327(8480). 519–523. 62 indexed citations

15.

Kirkpatrick, A.E., et al.. (1986). Specimen radiology of excised breast lesions. British journal of surgery. 73(9). 756–757. 2 indexed citations

16.

Kirkpatrick, A.E. & Law J. (1985). The usefulness of a moving grid in mammography. British Journal of Radiology. 58(687). 257–258. 4 indexed citations

17.

Muir, B.B., A.E. Kirkpatrick, M M Roberts, & S W Duffy. (1984). Oblique-view mammography: adequacy for screening. Work in progress.. Radiology. 151(1). 39–41. 18 indexed citations

18.

Muir, B.B., J Lamb, Thomas Anderson, & A.E. Kirkpatrick. (1983). Microcalcification and its relationship to cancer of the breast: Experience in a screening clinic. Clinical Radiology. 34(2). 193–200. 15 indexed citations

19.

HUTCHISON, D, et al.. (1971). The measurement of regional pulmonary density, ventilation and perfusion by gamma-ray densitometry. British Journal of Radiology. 44(528). 955–961. 4 indexed citations

20.

Kirkpatrick, A.E., et al.. (1970). Gamma densitometry in the study of ventilation and the pulmonary circulation. Clinical Radiology. 21(4). 396–402. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact