Baron Reed

677 total citations
19 papers, 283 citations indexed

About

Baron Reed is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Baron Reed has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 283 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Philosophy, 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Baron Reed's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers). Baron Reed is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers). Baron Reed collaborates with scholars based in United States. Baron Reed's co-authors include Ernest Sosa and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

In The Last Decade

Baron Reed

18 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Baron Reed United States 10 262 162 90 58 53 19 283
Michael Blome‐Tillmann United Kingdom 13 299 1.1× 189 1.2× 102 1.1× 70 1.2× 67 1.3× 33 373
Patrick Rysiew Canada 9 291 1.1× 197 1.2× 93 1.0× 50 0.9× 76 1.4× 27 327
Matthew A. Benton United States 12 246 0.9× 110 0.7× 85 0.9× 62 1.1× 28 0.5× 23 296
Levi Spectre Israel 7 233 0.9× 93 0.6× 105 1.2× 40 0.7× 52 1.0× 22 315
Juan Comesaña United States 11 402 1.5× 215 1.3× 222 2.5× 52 0.9× 54 1.0× 29 427
Adrian Haddock United Kingdom 7 243 0.9× 157 1.0× 110 1.2× 45 0.8× 17 0.3× 14 287
Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio Finland 8 357 1.4× 178 1.1× 174 1.9× 65 1.1× 38 0.7× 19 381
Bob Beddor Singapore 10 217 0.8× 113 0.7× 101 1.1× 33 0.6× 44 0.8× 26 246
Trent Dougherty United States 9 289 1.1× 118 0.7× 104 1.2× 49 0.8× 32 0.6× 27 311
Joshua Schechter United States 9 230 0.9× 153 0.9× 104 1.2× 49 0.8× 30 0.6× 19 335

Countries citing papers authored by Baron Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Baron Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Baron Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Baron Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Baron Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Baron Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Baron Reed. The network helps show where Baron Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Baron Reed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Baron Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Baron Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Baron Reed. Baron Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Reed, Baron. (2018). Practical Interests and Reasons for Belief. Oxford University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
2.
Reed, Baron. (2015). REASONS FOR REASONS. Episteme. 12(2). 241–247. 1 indexed citations
3.
Reed, Baron. (2015). Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. The Philosophical Review. 124(1). 159–162. 1 indexed citations
4.
Sosa, Ernest, et al.. (2013). Philosophical Issues: Epistemic Agency.
5.
Reed, Baron. (2013). Practical Matters Do Not Affect Whether You Know. 95–106. 8 indexed citations
6.
Reed, Baron. (2013). FALLIBILISM, EPISTEMIC POSSIBILITY, AND EPISTEMIC AGENCY. Philosophical Issues. 23(1). 40–69. 18 indexed citations
7.
Reed, Baron. (2012). Resisting Encroachment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 85(2). 465–472. 21 indexed citations
8.
Reed, Baron. (2012). Fallibilism. Philosophy Compass. 7(9). 585–596. 15 indexed citations
9.
Reed, Baron. (2011). Knowledge, doubt, and circularity. Synthese. 188(2). 273–287. 5 indexed citations
10.
Reed, Baron. (2010). A Defense of Stable Invariantism. Noûs. 44(2). 224–244. 73 indexed citations
11.
Reed, Baron. (2009). Self-Knowledge and Rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 80(1). 164–181. 6 indexed citations
12.
Reed, Baron. (2008). A new argument for skepticism. Philosophical Studies. 142(1). 91–104. 11 indexed citations
13.
Reed, Baron. (2007). The Long Road to Skepticism. The Journal of Philosophy. 104(5). 236–262. 6 indexed citations
14.
Reed, Baron. (2006). Shelter for the Cognitively Homeless. Synthese. 148(2). 303–308. 6 indexed citations
15.
Reed, Baron. (2006). Epistemic Circularity Squared? Skepticism about Common Sense. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 73(1). 186–197. 19 indexed citations
16.
Reed, Baron. (2005). Accidentally Factive Mental States. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 71(1). 134–142. 11 indexed citations
17.
Reed, Baron. (2002). How to Think about Fallibilism. Philosophical Studies. 107(2). 143–157. 53 indexed citations
18.
Reed, Baron. (2001). Epistemic Agency and the Intellectual Virtues. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 39(4). 507–526. 14 indexed citations
19.
Reed, Baron. (2000). Accidental Truth and Accidental Justification. The Philosophical Quarterly. 50(198). 57–67. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026