This map shows the geographic impact of E. de Juan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. de Juan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. de Juan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. de Juan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. de Juan. The network helps show where E. de Juan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. de Juan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. de Juan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. de Juan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. de Juan. E. de Juan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Humayun, Mark S., R. Freda, Ione Fine, et al.. (2005). Implanted Intraocular Retinal Prosthesis in Six Blind Subjects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 1144–1144.11 indexed citations
2.
Fujii, Gildo Y, et al.. (2004). USE OF NIGHT VISION IMAGE INTENSIFICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR RETINAL PROCEDURES. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 2807–2807.1 indexed citations
3.
Qiu, Guo‐Hua, et al.. (2004). Organization and differentiation of in vitro expanded retinal progenitor cells post–transplantation into degenerate rats. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 5403–5403.1 indexed citations
4.
Qiu, Guo‐Hua, et al.. (2004). Phenotypic characteristics of retinal progenitor cells isolated from hPAP–positive rat embryonic retina. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 5419–5419.1 indexed citations
5.
Equi, Robert, et al.. (2004). Subretinal Delivery of Triamcinolone in a Laser–Induced Primate Model of Choroidal Neovascularization: Angiographic and Histopathological Study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 5055–5055.4 indexed citations
Mahadevappa, Manjunatha, James D. Weiland, D. Yanai, et al.. (2003). Electrical Stimulus Parameters for Visual Perception in Blind Humans with Retinal Prosthetic Implants. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 5059–5059.2 indexed citations
9.
Yanai, D., James D. Weiland, Manjunatha Mahadevappa, et al.. (2003). Visual Perception in Blind Subjects with Microelectronic Retinal Prosthesis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 5056–5056.3 indexed citations
10.
Equi, Robert & E. de Juan. (2003). Subretinal Triamcinolone for the Treatment of Neovascular AMD: A Pilot Study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 1812–1812.1 indexed citations
11.
Juan, E. de, et al.. (2002). Multi-Dose Efficacy Study of Genistein in Laser-Induced Choroidal Neovascularization in Primates. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 1283–1283.1 indexed citations
Juan, E. de, et al.. (1996). [Presbyphonia: a study of acoustic parameters of normalcy].. PubMed. 47(4). 295–9.2 indexed citations
18.
Juan, E. de, Einar Stefánsson, & Akihiro Ohira. (1990). Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates 3H-thymidine uptake in retinal venular and capillary endothelial cells in vivo.. PubMed. 31(7). 1238–44.31 indexed citations
Juan, E. de, et al.. (1987). In vivo cannulation of retinal vessels. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 225(3). 221–225.26 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.