Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis
2003637 citationsMark S. Humayun, James D. Weiland et al.Vision Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B.V. Mech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.V. Mech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.V. Mech more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.V. Mech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.V. Mech. The network helps show where B.V. Mech may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B.V. Mech
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B.V. Mech.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B.V. Mech based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B.V. Mech. B.V. Mech is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Zhou, David, et al.. (2013). Long-term Reliability of Argus® II Retinal Implants. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 1037–1037.1 indexed citations
2.
McMahon, Matthew J., Ione Fine, Scott H. Greenwald, et al.. (2006). Electrode Impedance as a Predictor of Electrode–Retina Proximity and Perceptual Threshold in a Retinal Prosthesis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 3184–3184.7 indexed citations
Fujii, G.Y., Mark S. Humayun, James D. Weiland, et al.. (2003). Intraocular Retinal Prosthesis: First Generation Implant and its Surgical Technique. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 5079–5079.1 indexed citations
10.
Weiland, James D., et al.. (2003). Chronic Electrical Stimulation of the Retina in RCD1 and Normal Dog. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 5081–5081.2 indexed citations
11.
Humayun, Mark S., D. Yanai, B.V. Mech, et al.. (2003). Assessment of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness by Use of Optical Coherence Tomography and Retinal Dichroïsm Measurement: Preliminary Study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 3397–3397.13 indexed citations
12.
Humayun, Mark S., James D. Weiland, Gildo Y Fujii, et al.. (2003). Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Research. 43(24). 2573–2581.637 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.