Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing in primate somatosensory cortex
2000562 citationsPeter N. Steinmetz, Arup Roy et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Arup Roy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arup Roy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arup Roy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arup Roy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arup Roy. The network helps show where Arup Roy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arup Roy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arup Roy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arup Roy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Arup Roy. Arup Roy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
He, Yingchen, Susan Sun, Jonathan Perry, et al.. (2019). Characterizing the Visual Cortical Hemodynamic Response in Retinal Prostheses Users. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 4994–4994.1 indexed citations
11.
Caspi, Avi, et al.. (2019). Depth discrimination in Argus II wearers using a stereo sensor based on two head-mounted cameras. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 4975–4975.1 indexed citations
12.
He, Yingchen, Avi Caspi, Arup Roy, et al.. (2018). Development of an electroencephalogram (EEG) protocol to map electrically-elicited visual responses in blind patients implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 4572–4572.1 indexed citations
13.
Caspi, Avi, Arup Roy, Varalakshmi Wuyyuru, et al.. (2017). Eye movement control in Argus II retinal prosthesis users improves performance in a shape localization task. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 4192–4192.1 indexed citations
14.
Dagnelie, Gislin, et al.. (2016). Thermal imaging prototype enhances person identification and warm object localization by Argus II wearers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 5167–5167.3 indexed citations
Woods, Craig A., Arup Roy, & D. Fonn. (2006). Radial power profiles of single vision silicone hydrogel lenses. Optometry and Vision Science. 83. 65286–65286.1 indexed citations
18.
Humayun, Mark S., R. Freda, Ione Fine, et al.. (2005). Implanted Intraocular Retinal Prosthesis in Six Blind Subjects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 1144–1144.11 indexed citations
19.
Steinmetz, Peter N., Arup Roy, Paul J. Fitzgerald, et al.. (2000). Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing in primate somatosensory cortex. Nature. 404(6774). 187–190.562 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.