E Appel

23 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

E Appel
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 44
  • Human-Computer Interaction 126
  • Rehabilitation 109
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 93
  • Conservation 14
Replace Huei‐Ling Chiu with:
Huei‐Ling Chiu Taiwan
Huiru Yin China
Nick Bott United States
Tiffany Tong Canada
Marta Podhorecka Poland
Simona Gabriella Di Santo Italy
Hui Feng China
Kathy Peri New Zealand
Melinda M. Bopp United States
Willem Bossers Netherlands
E Appel relative to Huei‐Ling Chiu Taiwan Huei‐Ling Chiu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Huei‐Ling Chiu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E Appel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E Appel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E Appel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E Appel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E Appel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E Appel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E Appel. The network helps show where E Appel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E Appel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E Appel Line = papers co-authored together E Appel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020205
2 197549
3 201445
4 202031
5 197930
6 198127
7 202020
8 197917
9 202315
10 202212
11 198211
12 201110
13
Exercise induced changes of catecholamines and potassium in plasma of dogs after treatment with propranolol.
198010
14 20218
15 20147
16
Video camera and capacitive sensor data fusion for pedestrian protection systems
20134
17
The delayed auditory feedback (DAF) method for inducing stress in experiments with beta-blockers and benzodiazepines.
19803
18 19733
19 20223
20 19753

About E Appel

E Appel is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Rehabilitation, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Human-Computer Interaction and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (2 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (44 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (126 citations), Rehabilitation (109 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (93 citations) and Conservation (14 citations). E Appel has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Lora Appel, D. Palm, Howard Abrams, Micaela Wiseman, Natalie Ein, Orly Bogler, Jennifer L. Campos, H. Grobecker, G. Planz and A. Wnuk. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Medical Economics and Frontiers in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026