Natalie Ein
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
Papers in ⓘ
- Co-authors
- Kristin S. Vickers (12 shared papers)Jenny J. W. Liu (14 shared papers)Julia Gervasio (10 shared papers)Jens C. Pruessner (1 shared paper)Vivian Huang (1 shared paper)Katlyn Peck (1 shared paper)Maureen J. Reed (5 shared papers)Micaela Wiseman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Anthrozoös (4 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)Clinical Psychology Review (1 paper)Psychological Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Natalie Ein
23 papers receiving 757 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Behavioral Neuroscience 167
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 33
- Human-Computer Interaction 96
- Clinical Psychology 268
- Applied Psychology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Ein
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Ein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Ein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Ein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Ein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Ein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Ein. The network helps show where Natalie Ein may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Ein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 206 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 205 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 122 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 62 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 1 |
About Natalie Ein
Natalie Ein is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Sensory Systems, Clinical Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (6 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (4 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (167 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (33 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (96 citations), Clinical Psychology (268 citations) and Applied Psychology (63 citations). Natalie Ein has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kristin S. Vickers, Jenny J. W. Liu, Julia Gervasio, Jens C. Pruessner, Vivian Huang, Katlyn Peck, Maureen J. Reed, Micaela Wiseman, Orly Bogler and Lora Appel. Their work appears in journals such as Anthrozoös, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology Review and Psychological Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.